Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 29;65(3):223-30.
doi: 10.1538/expanim.15-0113. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

Combining isoflurane anesthesia with midazolam and butorphanol in rats

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Combining isoflurane anesthesia with midazolam and butorphanol in rats

Atsushi Tsukamoto et al. Exp Anim. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Representative inhalant anesthetic agent, isoflurane is commonly used during surgery in rats. However, isoflurane mediates relatively strong respiratory depression. In human and veterinary medicine, sedatives and analgesics are co-administered to complement the anesthetic action of inhalant anesthesia. The present study aimed to establish the novel balanced anesthesia that combines midazolam and butorphanol with isoflurane (MBI) in rats. Male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into 2 groups, and administered either isoflurane monoanesthesia or isoflurane with midazolam (2.5 mg/kg, ip) and butorphanol (2.0 mg/kg, ip). The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) in each group was evaluated. Induction and recovery times were measured in each group. Adverse reactions during induction were also recorded. In each group, vital signs were assessed for 1 h under 1.5×MAC of isoflurane. Instability of vital signs was assessed under each anesthesia by calculating coefficient of variance. Compared with isoflurane monoanesthesia, MBI anesthesia caused 32% MAC reduction (isoflurane monoanesthesia: 1.30 ± 0.09%, MBI 0.87 ± 0.08%, P<0.05). MB premedication mediated smooth sedating action with low incidence of adverse reactions such as urination and defecation. Isoflurane monoanesthsesia remarkably decreased respiratory rate and saturation O2 (SPO2). In contrast, MBI anesthesia resulted in a relatively stable respiratory rate without decreases in SPO2 during the anesthetic period. In summary, MB premedication is effective for attenuating respiratory depression induced by isoflurane, and achieving smooth induction. This anesthetic protocol serves as a novel option for appropriate anesthesia in rats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Comparison of MACs in groups treated with isoflurane alone (I) and a combination of midazolam, butorphanol, and isoflurane (MBI). Results are represented as mean ± SD of 7 rats. *P<0.05.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Measured rectal temperature in each anesthetic group. (A): rectal temperature over time in each group. (○): isoflurane-treated group. (●): group treated with a combination of midazolam, butorphanol, and isoflurane. (B): instability in rectal temperature in each group represented as coefficient variance (CV). Results are expressed as mean ± SD in 6 rats. †Significant difference from baseline (P<0.05). N.S.: not significant.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Measured heart rate in each anesthetic group. (A): heart rate over time in each group. (○): isoflurane-treated group. (●): group treated with a combination of midazolam, butorphanol, and isoflurane. (B): instability in heart rate in each group represented as coefficient variance (CV). Results are expressed as mean ± SD in 6 rats. †Significant difference from baseline (P<0.05). N.S.: not significant.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Measured respiratory rate in each anesthetic group. (A): respiratory rate over time in each group. (○): isoflurane-treated group. (●): group treated with a combination of midazolam, butorphanol, and isoflurane. (B): instability in respiratory rate over time represented by coefficient variance (CV). Results are expressed as mean ± SD in 6 rats. *Significant difference between groups (P<0.05). †Significant difference from baseline (P<0.05).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Measured SPO2 in each anesthetic group. (A): SPO2 over time in each group. (○): isoflurane-treated group. (●): group treated with a combination of midazolam, butorphanol, and isoflurane. (B): instability in SPO2 over time represented by coefficient variance (CV). Results are expressed as mean ± SD of 6 rats. *Significant difference between groups (P<0.05). †Significant difference from baseline (P<0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bauquier S.H., Golder F.J.2010. The effects of urethane on the isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration in rats. Lab. Anim. 44: 323–328. doi: 10.1258/la.2010.010025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buitrago S., Martin T.E., Tetens-Woodring J., Belicha-Villanueva A., Wilding G.E.2008. Safety and efficacy of various combinations of injectable anesthetics in BALB/c mice. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 47: 11–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cesarovic N., Nicholls F., Rettich A., Kronen P., Hässig M., Jirkof P., Arras M.2010. Isoflurane and sevoflurane provide equally effective anaesthesia in laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 44: 329–336. doi: 10.1258/la.2010.009085 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cesarovic N., Jirkof P., Rettich A., Nicholls F., Arras M.2012. Combining sevoflurane anesthesia with fentanyl-midazolam or s-ketamine in laboratory mice. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 51: 209–218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornett P.M., Matta J.A., Ahern G.P.2008. General anesthetics sensitize the capsaicin receptor transient receptor potential V1. Mol. Pharmacol. 74: 1261–1268. doi: 10.1124/mol.108.049684 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms