Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis
- PMID: 26890472
- PMCID: PMC4874663
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505215
Long-Term Results of Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis
Abstract
Background: In the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial, we found no significant difference between the stenting group and the endarterectomy group with respect to the primary composite end point of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the periprocedural period or any subsequent ipsilateral stroke during 4 years of follow-up. We now extend the results to 10 years.
Methods: Among patients with carotid-artery stenosis who had been randomly assigned to stenting or endarterectomy, we evaluated outcomes every 6 months for up to 10 years at 117 centers. In addition to assessing the primary composite end point, we assessed the primary end point for the long-term extension study, which was ipsilateral stroke after the periprocedural period.
Results: Among 2502 patients, there was no significant difference in the rate of the primary composite end point between the stenting group (11.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1 to 14.8) and the endarterectomy group (9.9%; 95% CI, 7.9 to 12.2) over 10 years of follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.44). With respect to the primary long-term end point, postprocedural ipsilateral stroke over the 10-year follow-up occurred in 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4 to 9.7) of the patients in the stenting group and in 5.6% (95% CI, 3.7 to 7.6) of those in the endarterectomy group; the rates did not differ significantly between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.52). No significant between-group differences with respect to either end point were detected when symptomatic patients and asymptomatic patients were analyzed separately.
Conclusions: Over 10 years of follow-up, we did not find a significant difference between patients who underwent stenting and those who underwent endarterectomy with respect to the risk of periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, or death and subsequent ipsilateral stroke. The rate of postprocedural ipsilateral stroke also did not differ between groups. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and Abbott Vascular Solutions; CREST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004732.).
Figures
Comment in
-
Endarterectomy, Stenting, or Neither for Asymptomatic Carotid-Artery Stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1087-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1600123. Epub 2016 Feb 18. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 26890473 No abstract available.
-
[Carotis stenosis: Stenting is eqivalent to endarteriectomy in the long term].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2016 May;141(10):678-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-103717. Epub 2016 May 13. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2016. PMID: 27176057 German. No abstract available.
-
Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Stenting vs Endarterectomy for Treatment of Severe Carotid Stenosis.Neurosurgery. 2016 Aug;79(2):N20-2. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000489890.47483.49. Neurosurgery. 2016. PMID: 27428641 No abstract available.
-
Stenting versus Surgery for Carotid Stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):601-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1605166. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 27509115 No abstract available.
-
Stenting versus Surgery for Carotid Stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):602. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1605166. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 27509116 No abstract available.
-
Stenting versus Surgery for Carotid Stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):603. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1605166. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 27509118 No abstract available.
-
Stenting versus Surgery for Carotid Stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):604-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1605166. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 27517107 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID: 20505173 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5. Lancet Neurol. 2008. PMID: 18774745 Clinical Trial.
-
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20. J Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23265585 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: updated meta-analysis, metaregression and trial sequential analysis of short-term and intermediate-to long-term outcomes of randomized trials.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016 Aug;57(4):519-39. Epub 2016 Feb 17. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016. PMID: 26883249 Review.
-
Long-term efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PLoS One. 2017 Jul 14;12(7):e0180804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180804. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28708869 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Current Status of Carotid Artery Stenting.Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023 Feb 9;9(3):122-126. doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2022-0020. eCollection 2024 Nov 1. Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2023. PMID: 39559811 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Nationwide Analysis in France on Sex Difference and Outcomes Following Carotid Intervention in Asymptomatic Patients.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 9;13(19):6019. doi: 10.3390/jcm13196019. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39408079 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of tailored antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting: a retrospective comparative study.CVIR Endovasc. 2024 Oct 9;7(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s42155-024-00482-2. CVIR Endovasc. 2024. PMID: 39379742 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency Carotid Thrombo-Endarterectomy after Failed Endovascular Recanalization for Acute Complete Carotid Occlusion: A Case Report.Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 30;14(9):882. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090882. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 39335378 Free PMC article.
-
The Dual-layer CGuard Stent Is Safe and Effective in Emergent Carotid Artery Stenting and in Tandem Occlusions: a Multi-centric Study.Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01455-7. Online ahead of print. Clin Neuroradiol. 2024. PMID: 39225802
References
-
- Office of the Chief Actuary (U.S.) Actuarial life table: period life table. Baltimore: Social Security Administration; 2011. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html.
-
- Hobson RW., II CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial): background, design, and current status. Semin Vasc Surg. 2000;13:139–143. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical