Background/aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes after palliative surgery for patients with incurable gastric cancer.
Methodology: This retrospective study included 45 patients with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) who needed parental nutrition and 33 patients with anemia due to tumor bleeding who required blood transfusions. We compared the surgical outcomes of palliative gastrectomy (PG) and bypass surgery (BS) in each group.
Results: In the GOO patients, the clinical success rate, as indicated by a resumption of an oral diet, was similar in the PG and BS groups. The time to treatment failure, when the GOO patients again required parental nutrition, was also similar between the two groups. In the anemia patients, the clinical success rate of the PG group was higher than that of BS group, and the post-operative performance status (PS) of the PG group was also better than that of the BS group, although the pre-operative PS were similar in both groups.
Conclusions: PG for the GOO patients gave little advantage compared to BS, and was associated with a longer operation, higher blood loss and more frequent complications. PG may be recommended for patients with GOO when they simultaneously have anemia due to tumor bleeding.