Testing for myositis specific autoantibodies: Comparison between line blot and immunoprecipitation assays in 57 myositis sera

J Immunol Methods. 2016 Jun:433:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the performance of a line blot assay for the identification of autoantibodies in sera of patients affected by myositis, compared with immunoprecipitation (IP) as gold standard.

Methods: 66 sera of patients with myositis (23 polymyositis, 8 anti-synthetase syndromes, 29 dermatomyositis and 6 overlap syndromes) were tested by commercial LB (Euroimmun, Lubeck, Germany); 57 sera were analyzed also by IP of K562 cell extract radiolabeled with (35)S-methionine. Inter-rater agreement was calculated with Cohen's k coefficient.

Results: Myositis-specific antibodies (MSA) were detected in 36/57 sera (63%) by IP and in 39/66 sera (59%) by LB. The most frequent MSA found by LB were anti-Jo1 and anti-Mi2 found in 15% (10/66) of sera, followed by anti-NXP2 and anti-SRP detected in 106% (7/66) of sera. Anti-TIF1gamma and anti-MDA5 were found in 6 (9%) and 5 sera (7.6%), respectively. A good agreement between methods was found only for anti-TIF1γ, anti-MDA5 and anti-NXP-2 antibodies, while a moderate agreement was estimated for anti-Mi2 and anti-EJ. By contrast, a high discordance rate for the detection of anti-Jo1 antibodies was evident (k: 0.3). Multiple positivity for MSA were found in 11/66 (17%) by LB and 0/57 by IP (p: 0001). Comparing the clinical features of these 11 sera, we found total discrepancies between assays in 3 sera (27.3%), a relative discrepancy due to the occurrence of one discordant autoantibody (not confirmed by IP) in 5 cases (45.5%) and a total discrepancy between LB and IP results, but with a relative concordance with clinical features were found in other 3 sera (27.3%). The semiquantitative results do not support the interpretation of the data.

Conclusions: The use of LB assay allowed the detection of new MSA, such as anti-MDA5, anti-MJ and anti-TIF1gamma antibodies, previously not found with routine methods. However, the high prevalence of multiple positivities and the high discondant rate of anti-Jo1 antibodies could create some misinterpretation of the results from the clinical point of view. These data should be confirmed by enlarging the number of myositis cases.

Keywords: Anti-Jo1; Anti-synthetase syndrome; Autoantibodies; Immunoprecipitation; Line blot; Myositis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adenosine Triphosphatases / immunology
  • Adult
  • Antibodies, Antinuclear / blood*
  • DNA-Binding Proteins / immunology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay / methods*
  • Immunoprecipitation
  • Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1 / immunology
  • K562 Cells
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myositis / blood*
  • Myositis / diagnosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Transcription Factors / immunology

Substances

  • Antibodies, Antinuclear
  • DNA-Binding Proteins
  • Jo-1 antibody
  • TRIM33 protein, human
  • Transcription Factors
  • Adenosine Triphosphatases
  • IFIH1 protein, human
  • MORC3 protein, human
  • Interferon-Induced Helicase, IFIH1