The Healthy Immigrant Paradox and Child Maltreatment: A Systematic Review

J Immigr Minor Health. 2016 Oct;18(5):1199-1215. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0373-7.

Abstract

Prior studies suggest that foreign-born individuals have a health advantage, referred to as the Healthy Immigrant Paradox, when compared to native-born persons of the same socio-economic status. This systematic review examined whether the immigrant advantage found in health literature is mirrored by child maltreatment in general and its forms in particular. The author searched Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, CINAHL PLUS, Family and Society Studies Worldwide, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and SocINdex for published literature through December 2015. The review followed an evidence-based Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The author identified 822 unique articles, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria. The reviewed data showed strong support for the healthy immigrant paradox for a general form of maltreatment and physical abuse. The evidence for emotional and sexual abuse was also suggestive of immigrant advantage though relatively small sample size and lack of multivariate controls make these findings tentative. The evidence for neglect was mixed: immigrants were less likely to be reported to Child Protective Services; however, they had higher rates of physical neglect and lack of supervision in the community data. The study results warrant confirmation with newer data possessing strong external validity for immigrant samples.

Keywords: Child maltreatment; Epidemiology; Healthy immigrant paradox; Immigrants; Systematic review.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Child Abuse / ethnology*
  • Child Abuse, Sexual / ethnology
  • Emigrants and Immigrants / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Risk Factors