Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing
- PMID: 26928821
- DOI: 10.7326/M15-0995
Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing
Abstract
Background: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) personal genomic testing (PGT) allows individuals to learn about their genetic makeup without going through a physician, but some consumers share their results with their primary care provider (PCP).
Objective: To describe the characteristics and perceptions of DTC PGT consumers who discuss their results with their PCP.
Design: Longitudinal, prospective cohort study.
Setting: Online survey before and 6 months after results.
Participants: DTC PGT consumers.
Measurements: Consumer satisfaction with the DTC PGT experience; whether and, if so, how many results could be used to improve health; how many results were not understood; and beliefs about the PCP's understanding of genetics. Participants were asked with whom they had discussed their results. Genetic reports were linked to survey responses.
Results: Among 1026 respondents, 63% planned to share their results with a PCP. At 6-month follow-up, 27% reported having done so, and 8% reported sharing with another health care provider only. Common reasons for not sharing results with a health care provider were that the results were not important enough (40%) or that the participant did not have time to do so (37%). Among participants who discussed results with their PCP, 35% were very satisfied with the encounter, and 18% were not at all satisfied. Frequently identified themes in participant descriptions of these encounters were actionability of the results or use in care (32%), PCP engagement or interest (25%), and lack of PCP engagement or interest (22%).
Limitation: Participants may not be representative of all DTC PGT consumers.
Conclusion: A comprehensive picture of DTC PGT consumers who shared their results with a health care provider is presented. The proportion that shares results is expected to increase with time after testing as consumers find opportunities for discussion at later appointments or if results become relevant as medical needs evolve.
Primary funding source: National Institutes of Health.
Comment in
-
Public genomes: the future of the NHS?Lancet. 2017 Jul 15;390(10091):203. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31859-7. Lancet. 2017. PMID: 28721862 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000455006. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Public Health Genomics. 2017. PMID: 28068660
-
Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.Intern Med J. 2014 Jan;44(1):27-31. doi: 10.1111/imj.12289. Intern Med J. 2014. PMID: 24450520
-
Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):537-545. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.141. Epub 2016 Sep 22. Genet Med. 2017. PMID: 27657683 Free PMC article.
-
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 14;17(12):e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4378. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 26677835 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing and cancer risk prediction.Cancer J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182610e38. Cancer J. 2012. PMID: 22846729 Review.
Cited by
-
Nephrologists' Views on a Workflow for Returning Genetic Results to Research Participants.Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Sep 2;9(11):3278-3289. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.08.026. eCollection 2024 Nov. Kidney Int Rep. 2024. PMID: 39534211 Free PMC article.
-
Genetics healthcare providers' experiences counseling patients with results from consumer genomic testing.Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024 Aug;12(8):e2508. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2508. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024. PMID: 39140689 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Tests in Preventive Oncology: Emerging Needs and Opportunities.J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;41(1):11-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00995. Epub 2022 Aug 9. J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 35944238 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perspectives on Consumer and Clinical Genetic Testing Education among Medical Students in West Texas.J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2022 May 2;12(3):28-32. doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1050. eCollection 2022. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2022. PMID: 35711394 Free PMC article.
-
Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services.Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar 3;109(3):486-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 24. Am J Hum Genet. 2022. PMID: 35216680 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical