Prospective evaluation of the ability of clinical scoring systems and physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis to obviate the need for CT
- PMID: 26935714
- PMCID: PMC5443621
- DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205301
Prospective evaluation of the ability of clinical scoring systems and physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis to obviate the need for CT
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether clinical scoring systems or physician gestalt can obviate the need for computed tomography (CT) in patients with possible appendicitis.
Methods: Prospective, observational study of patients with abdominal pain at an academic emergency department (ED) from February 2012 to February 2014. Patients over 11 years old who had a CT ordered for possible appendicitis were eligible. All parameters needed to calculate the scores were recorded on standardised forms prior to CT. Physicians also estimated the likelihood of appendicitis. Test characteristics were calculated using clinical follow-up as the reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn.
Results: Of the 287 patients (mean age (range), 31 (12-88) years; 60% women), the prevalence of appendicitis was 33%. The Alvarado score had a positive likelihood ratio (LR(+)) (95% CI) of 2.2 (1.7 to 3) and a negative likelihood ratio (LR(-)) of 0.6 (0.4 to 0.7). The modified Alvarado score (MAS) had LR(+) 2.4 (1.6 to 3.4) and LR(-) 0.7 (0.6 to 0.8). The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) score had LR(+) 1.3 (1.1 to 1.5) and LR(-) 0.5 (0.4 to 0.8). Physician-determined likelihood of appendicitis had LR(+) 1.3 (1.2 to 1.5) and LR(-) 0.3 (0.2 to 0.6). When combined with physician likelihoods, LR(+) and LR(-) was 3.67 and 0.48 (Alvarado), 2.33 and 0.45 (RIPASA), and 3.87 and 0.47 (MAS). The area under the curve was highest for physician-determined likelihood (0.72), but was not statistically significantly different from the clinical scores (RIPASA 0.67, Alvarado 0.72, MAS 0.7).
Conclusions: Clinical scoring systems performed equally well as physician gestalt in predicting appendicitis. These scores do not obviate the need for imaging for possible appendicitis when a physician deems it necessary.
Keywords: abdomen- non trauma, gastro-intestinal; clinical assessment, effectiveness; imaging, CT/MRI.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Conflict of interest statement
Perry J. Pickhardt, MD has the following financial disclosures: Co-founder, VirtuoCTC and shareholder, Cellectar Biosciences. The other authors have no financial conflicts.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Which One is Better? Comparison of the Acute Inflammatory Response, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and Alvarado Scoring Systems.Ann Coloproctol. 2017 Dec;33(6):227-231. doi: 10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.227. Epub 2017 Dec 31. Ann Coloproctol. 2017. PMID: 29354605 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and modified Alvarado scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):521-524. doi: 10.1111/ans.15607. Epub 2019 Dec 15. ANZ J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31840385
-
RIPASA and air scoring systems are superior to alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy study.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Sep 24;59:138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.029. eCollection 2020 Nov. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020. PMID: 33024555 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Laboratory Tests, and Point-of-care Ultrasound for Pediatric Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):523-551. doi: 10.1111/acem.13181. Acad Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28214369 Review.
-
Alvarado or RIPASA score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 12. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 30017607 Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparison of the Alvarado Score and the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) Score in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e68041. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68041. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39347188 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of RIPASA and ALVARADO scores for risk assessment of acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2022 Sep 30;17(9):e0275427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275427. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36178953 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of acute appendicitis based on clinical scores: is it a myth or reality?Acta Biomed. 2021 Sep 2;92(4):e2021231. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i4.11666. Acta Biomed. 2021. PMID: 34487066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing the Accuracy of Ohmann and Alvarado Scoring Systems in Detection of Acute Appendicitis; a Cross-Sectional Study.Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021 May 5;9(1):e37. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1187. eCollection 2021. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34223182 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Performance of Emergency Physician Gestalt for Predicting Acute Appendicitis in Patients Age 5 to 20 Years.Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;27(9):821-831. doi: 10.1111/acem.13931. Epub 2020 Apr 2. Acad Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 32239713 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557–564. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical