Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;127(2):204-12.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001159.

Trying to Conceive After an Early Pregnancy Loss: An Assessment on How Long Couples Should Wait

Affiliations

Trying to Conceive After an Early Pregnancy Loss: An Assessment on How Long Couples Should Wait

Karen C Schliep et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To compare time to pregnancy and live birth among couples with varying intervals of pregnancy loss date to subsequent trying to conceive date.

Methods: In this secondary analysis of the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction trial, 1,083 women aged 18-40 years with one to two prior early losses and whose last pregnancy outcome was a nonectopic or nonmolar loss were included. Participants were actively followed for up to six menstrual cycles and, for women achieving pregnancy, until pregnancy outcome. We calculated intervals as start of trying to conceive date minus pregnancy loss date. Time to pregnancy was defined as start of trying to conceive until subsequent conception. Discrete Cox models, accounting for left truncation and right censoring, estimated fecundability odds ratios (ORs) adjusting for age, race, body mass index, education, and subfertility. Although intervals were assessed prior to randomization and thus reasoned to have no relation with treatment assignment, additional adjustment for treatment was evaluated given that low-dose aspirin was previously shown to be predictive of time to pregnancy.

Results: Couples with a 0-3-month interval (n=765 [76.7%]) compared with a greater than 3-month (n=233 [23.4%]) interval were more likely to achieve live birth (53.2% compared with 36.1%) with a significantly shorter time to pregnancy leading to live birth (median [interquartile range] five cycles [three, eight], adjusted fecundability OR 1.71 [95% confidence interval 1.30-2.25]). Additionally adjusting for low-dose aspirin treatment did not appreciably alter estimates.

Conclusion: Our study supports the hypothesis that there is no physiologic evidence for delaying pregnancy attempt after an early loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An illustration of the relationship between the variables included in the survival model, where inter-trying interval is the exposure of interest, time to pregnancy is the outcome of interest, and dotted line represents the delayed entry time. EAGeR, Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram outlining participants included and excluded in this analysis from the original Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction (EAGeR) trial study population. *Multiple imputation used for 85 women to correct for bias due to missing information.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;12(368):601–11. - PubMed
    1. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;28(319):189–94. - PubMed
    1. Katz VL. Spontaneous and recurrent abortion: etiology, diagnosis, treatment. Comprehensive gynecology. In: Katz VL, Lentz GM, Lobo RA, Gershenson DM, editors. Comprehensive Gynecology. 5th Mosby Elsevier; Philadelphia (PA): 2007. p. 381.
    1. After a Miscarriage: Getting Pregnant Again Pregnancy Loss. Available at: http://americanpregnancy.org/pregnancy-loss/after-miscarriage-getting-pr.... Retrieved June 13, 2015.
    1. World Health Organization Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing, Geneva Switzerland 13-15 June 2005. Available at: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/birth_spacing.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2015.

Publication types