Iris-claw intraocular lens implantation: Anterior chamber versus retropupillary implantation

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;64(1):45-9. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.178139.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of anterior chamber and retropupillary implantation of iris-claw Artisan intraocular lenses (IOL).

Design: Prospective, randomized, single-blinded study.

Patients and methods: Forty eyes of forty aphakic patients were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups. Each group includes twenty patients. Group 1 received anterior chamber Artisan IOL implantation. Group 2 received retropupillary Artisan IOL implantation. Preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and all complications were noted and compared at 6 months follow-up.

Results: Each two groups obtained a significant improvement in CDVA (P < 0.05). Four patients in Group 1 and five patients in Group 2 had significant but nonpermanent increase at IOP values. There were one and two pupillary irregularity in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. In one patient, a shallow and inferior located retinal detachment were encountered in anterior chamber group.

Conclusions: The results were not significantly different between the two fixation techniques for iris-claw lens. The surgery procedure is dependent to surgeon experience and eye's conditions.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anterior Chamber / surgery*
  • Aphakia, Postcataract / physiopathology
  • Aphakia, Postcataract / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Iris / surgery*
  • Lens Implantation, Intraocular / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Phakic Intraocular Lenses*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Visual Acuity / physiology