Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar 8;315(10):1034-45.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0299.

Polypharmacy in the Aging Patient: A Review of Glycemic Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Affiliations
Review

Polypharmacy in the Aging Patient: A Review of Glycemic Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Kasia J Lipska et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: There is substantial uncertainty about optimal glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Observations: Four large randomized clinical trials (RCTs), ranging in size from 1791 to 11,440 patients, provide the majority of the evidence used to guide diabetes therapy. Most RCTs of intensive vs standard glycemic control excluded adults older than 80 years, used surrogate end points to evaluate microvascular outcomes and provided limited data on which subgroups are most likely to benefit or be harmed by specific therapies. Available data from randomized clinical trials suggest that intensive glycemic control does not reduce major macrovascular events in older adults for at least 10 years. Furthermore, intensive glycemic control does not lead to improved patient-centered microvascular outcomes for at least 8 years. Data from randomized clinical trials consistently suggest that intensive glycemic control immediately increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia 1.5- to 3-fold. Based on these data and observational studies, for the majority of adults older than 65 years, the harms associated with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target lower than 7.5% or higher than 9% are likely to outweigh the benefits. However, the optimal target depends on patient factors, medications used to reach the target, life expectancy, and patient preferences about treatment. If only medications with low treatment burden and hypoglycemia risk (such as metformin) are required, a lower HbA1c target may be appropriate. If patients strongly prefer to avoid injections or frequent fingerstick monitoring, a higher HbA1c target that obviates the need for insulin may be appropriate.

Conclusions and relevance: High-quality evidence about glycemic treatment in older adults is lacking. Optimal decisions need to be made collaboratively with patients, incorporating the likelihood of benefits and harms and patient preferences about treatment and treatment burden. For the majority of older adults, an HbA1c target between 7.5% and 9% will maximize benefits and minimize harms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Lipska reports receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Lipska also reports receiving support from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to develop and maintain publicly reported quality measures. Dr Lee reports receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging and the American Federation for Aging Research. Dr Krumholz reports receiving personal fees for serving as chair of the Scientific Advisory Board of United Health and other support from Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) and Medtronic.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Framework to Individualize Glycemic Treatment Decisions in Older Adults

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cheng YJ, Imperatore G, Geiss LS, et al. Secular changes in the age-specific prevalence of diabetes among US adults: 1988–2010. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2690–2696. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gregg EW, Cheng YJ, Saydah S, et al. Trends in death rates among US adults with and without diabetes between 1997 and 2006: findings from the National Health Interview Survey. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1252–1257. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Accessed February 1, 2016];National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States. 2011 http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf.
    1. Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, Barker LE, Williamson DF. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr. 2010;8:29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang AM, Halter JB. Aging and insulin secretion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;284(1):E7–E12. - PubMed

MeSH terms