Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;12(3):20151007.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.1007.

Genetic diversity confers colony-level benefits due to individual immunity

Affiliations

Genetic diversity confers colony-level benefits due to individual immunity

Michael Simone-Finstrom et al. Biol Lett. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Several costs and benefits arise as a consequence of eusociality and group-living. With increasing group size, spread of disease among nest-mates poses selective pressure on both individual immunity and group-level mechanisms of disease resistance (social immunity). Another factor known to influence colony-level expression of disease is intracolony genetic diversity, which in honeybees (Apis mellifera) is a direct function of the number of mates of the queen. Colonies headed by queens with higher mating numbers have less variable infections of decreased intensity, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. By pathogen-challenging larvae in vitro, we decoupled larval immune response from mechanisms of social immunity. Our results show that baseline immunity and degree of immune response do not vary with genetic diversity. However, intracolony variance in antimicrobial peptide production after pathogen challenge decreases with increasing genetic diversity. This reduction in variability of the larval immune response could drive the mitigation of disease observed in genetically diverse colonies.

Keywords: Apis mellifera; individual versus social immunity; polyandry; social insects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relative expression of abaecin and hymenoptaecin in unchallenged (control) and challenged larvae from colonies ranging in level of genetic diversity. There was no significant relationship for relative expression and mating frequency for either gene based on linear regressions (hymenoptaecin—unchallenged: R2 = 0.002, p = 0.48; challenged: R2 = 0.009, p = 0.16; abaecin—unchallenged: R2 = 0.002, p = 0.61; challenged: R2 = 0.003, p = 0.49).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Intracolony variance in hymenoptaecin expression after challenge with American foulbrood decreases as genetic diversity increases, with each point indicating the variance among samples from a single colony (R2 = 0.14, p = 0.04).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evans JD, et al. 2006. Immune pathways and defence mechanisms in honey bees Apis mellifera. Insect Mol. Biol. 15, 645–656. (10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00682.x) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barribeau SM, et al. 2015. A depauperate immune repertoire precedes evolution of sociality in bees. Genome Biol. 16, 83 (10.1186/s13059-015-0628-y) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tarpy DR, Nielsen DI. 2002. Sampling error, effective paternity, and estimating the genetic structure of honey bee colonies (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Anna. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95, 513–528. (10.1603/0013-8746(2002)095[0513:SEEPAE]2.0.co;2) - DOI
    1. Palmer KA, Oldroyd BP. 2003. Evidence for intra-colonial genetic variance in resistance to American foulbrood of honey bees (Apis mellifera): further support for the parasite/pathogen hypothesis for the evolution of polyandry. Naturwissenschaften 90, 265–268. (10.1007/s00114-003-0418-3) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith CR, Toth AL, Suarez AV, Robinson GE. 2008. Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 735–748. (10.1038/nrg2429) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources