The Evidence Against Cardiac Screening Using Electrocardiogram in Athletes

Curr Sports Med Rep. 2016 Mar-Apr;15(2):81-5. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000237.

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young athletes is publicly remarkable and tragic because of the loss of a seemingly healthy young person. Because many of the potential etiologies may be identified with a preparticipation electrocardiogram (ECG), the possible use of an ECG as a screening tool has received much attention. A good screening test should be cost-effective and should influence a disease or health outcome that has a significant impact on public health. The reality is that the prevalence of SCD is low and no outcome-based data exist to determine whether early detection saves lives. Further, there is insufficient screening infrastructure, and the risk of screening and follow-up may be higher than that of the actual disease. Until outcomes data demonstrate a benefit with regard to SCD, universal screening cannot be recommended.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Athletes*
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / economics
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / mortality
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis / economics
  • Death, Sudden, Cardiac / prevention & control*
  • Electrocardiography / economics
  • Electrocardiography / standards
  • Electrocardiography / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening / economics
  • Mass Screening / standards
  • Mass Screening / statistics & numerical data*
  • Physical Examination / economics
  • Physical Examination / standards
  • Physical Examination / statistics & numerical data
  • Risk Factors