A Model of Organizational Context and Shared Decision Making: Application to LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients
- PMID: 26988980
- PMCID: PMC4870417
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3608-3
A Model of Organizational Context and Shared Decision Making: Application to LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) occurs when patients and clinicians work together to reach care decisions that are both medically sound and responsive to patients' preferences and values. SDM is an important tenet of patient-centered care that can improve patient outcomes. Patients with multiple minority identities, such as sexual orientation and race/ethnicity, are at particular risk for poor SDM. Among these dual-minority patients, added challenges to clear and open communication include cultural barriers, distrust, and a health care provider's lack of awareness of the patient's minority sexual orientation or gender identity. However, organizational factors like a culture of inclusion and private space throughout the visit can improve SDM with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender ("LGBT") racial/ethnic minority patients who have faced stigma and discrimination. Most models of shared decision making focus on the patient-provider interaction, but the health care organization's context is also critical. Context-an organization's structure and operations-can strongly influence the ability and willingness of patients and clinicians to engage in shared decision making. SDM is most likely to be optimal if organizations transform their contexts and patients and providers improve their communication. Thus, we propose a conceptual model that suggests ways in which organizations can shape their contextual structure and operations to support SDM. The model contains six drivers: workflows, health information technology, organizational structure and culture, resources and clinic environment, training and education, and incentives and disincentives. These drivers work through four mechanisms to impact care: continuity and coordination, the ease of SDM, knowledge and skills, and attitudes and beliefs. These mechanisms can activate clinicians and patients to engage in high-quality SDM. We provide examples of how specific contextual changes could make SDM more effective for LGBT racial/ethnic minority populations, focusing especially on transformations that would establish a safe environment, build trust, and decrease stigma.
Keywords: bisexual; disparities; gay; lesbian; practice redesign; race and ethnicity; shared decision making; transgender.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Improving Shared Decision Making with LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31(6):591-3. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3607-4. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26988979 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Development of a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Shared Decision making Among African-American LGBT Patients and their Clinicians.J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31(6):677-87. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3616-3. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27008649 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving Cultural Competence to Reduce Health Disparities [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Mar. Report No.: 16-EHC006-EF. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Mar. Report No.: 16-EHC006-EF. PMID: 27148614 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Scrambling for access: availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of healthcare for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in South Africa.BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 May 30;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12914-017-0124-4. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017. PMID: 28558693 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Shared Decision Making with LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31(6):591-3. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3607-4. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26988979 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Race and shared decision-making: perspectives of African-Americans with diabetes.Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Mar 24. Soc Sci Med. 2010. PMID: 20409625 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Promoting equitable sexual health communication among patients with minoritized racial/ethnic, sexual orientation, and gender identities: Strategies, challenges, and opportunities.Soc Sci Med. 2024 Mar;344:116634. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116634. Epub 2024 Feb 1. Soc Sci Med. 2024. PMID: 38394863
-
Lack of Informed and Affirming Healthcare for Sexual Minority Men: A Call for Patient-Centered Care.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(11):2023-2032. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08635-8. Epub 2024 Feb 2. J Gen Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38308157 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing widening disparities in HbA1c and systolic blood pressure retesting during the COVID-19 pandemic in an LGBTQ+-focused federally qualified health center in Chicago: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 Dec;10(6):e002990. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-002990. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022. PMID: 36593660 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the environment for engagement in health services: The Audit for Consumer Engagement (ACE) tool.Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3027-3039. doi: 10.1111/hex.13610. Epub 2022 Oct 28. Health Expect. 2022. PMID: 36307992 Free PMC article.
-
Advance Care Planning Experiences Among Sexual and Gender Minority People.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222993. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22993. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35857322 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
