Validity of a Simple Method for Measuring Force-Velocity-Power Profile in Countermovement Jump

Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Jan;12(1):36-43. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0484. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the reliability and validity of a simple computation method to evaluate force (F), velocity (v), and power (P) output during a countermovement jump (CMJ) suitable for use in field conditions and to verify the validity of this computation method to compute the CMJ force-velocity (F-v) profile (including unloaded and loaded jumps) in trained athletes.

Methods: Sixteen high-level male sprinters and jumpers performed maximal CMJs under 6 different load conditions (0-87 kg). A force plate sampling at 1000 Hz was used to record vertical ground-reaction force and derive vertical-displacement data during CMJ trials. For each condition, mean F, v, and P of the push-off phase were determined from both force-plate data (reference method) and simple computation measures based on body mass, jump height (from flight time), and push-off distance and used to establish the linear F-v relationship for each individual.

Results: Mean absolute bias values were 0.9% (± 1.6%), 4.7% (± 6.2%), 3.7% (± 4.8%), and 5% (± 6.8%) for F, v, P, and slope of the F-v relationship (SFv), respectively. Both methods showed high correlations for F-v-profile-related variables (r = .985-.991). Finally, all variables computed from the simple method showed high reliability, with ICC >.980 and CV <1.0%.

Conclusions: These results suggest that the simple method presented here is valid and reliable for computing CMJ force, velocity, power, and F-v profiles in athletes and could be used in practice under field conditions when body mass, push-off distance, and jump height are known.

Keywords: force–velocity relationship; jumping; lower-limb explosive performance; resistance training.

MeSH terms

  • Athletic Performance / physiology*
  • Body Mass Index
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Exercise Test / methods
  • Exercise Test / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Plyometric Exercise*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Young Adult