Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul;16(7):895-901.
doi: 10.1517/14712598.2016.1170805. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

Considerations for the Combination of Anticancer Vaccines and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Considerations for the Combination of Anticancer Vaccines and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Julius Strauss et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past few years, trials evaluating immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have revolutionized the standard model of cancer treatment, demonstrating significant antitumor responses and improved clinical outcomes across a wide array of tumors types. Yet, despite these compelling data, a major limitation has been that only a fraction of patients mount a response to single-agent immune checkpoint inhibition. However, a growing amount of preclinical and clinical data suggests that combining immune checkpoint inhibition, either with other immune checkpoint inhibitors or with therapeutic cancer vaccines, has the potential to improve the proportion of patients seeing long-term durable responses with these therapies.

Areas covered: We have reviewed the reported data on immune checkpoint inhibition as monotherapy and as combination therapy with other immune checkpoint inhibitors or therapeutic cancer vaccines. Data is reviewed on agents with FDA approval or breakthrough designation as of the writing of this manuscript.

Expert opinion: Particular focus is given to the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and therapeutic cancer vaccines which has the potential to increase efficacy compared to single agent immune checkpoint inhibition with minimal added toxicity.

Keywords: Immune checkpoint inhibitors; immunogenic intensification; therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 6 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

MeSH terms

Feedback