Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2016 Mar 29;67(12):1387-1395.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.055.

Should Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Be Performed in Nonagenarians?: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Should Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Be Performed in Nonagenarians?: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry

Mani Arsalan et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: Data demonstrating the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the very elderly patients are limited, as they often represent only a small proportion of the trial populations.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of nonagenarians to younger patients undergoing TAVR in current practice.

Methods: We analyzed data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry. Outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were compared between patients ≥90 years versus <90 years of age using cumulative incidence curves. Quality of life was assessed with the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.

Results: Between November 2011 and September 2014, 24,025 patients underwent TAVR in 329 participating hospitals, of which 3,773 (15.7%) were age ≥90 years. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were significantly higher among nonagenarians (age ≥90 years vs. <90 years: 30-day: 8.8% vs. 5.9%; p < 0.001; 1 year: 24.8% vs. 22.0%; p < 0.001, absolute risk: 2.8%, relative risk: 12.7%). However, nonagenarians had a higher mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Operative Mortality score (10.9% vs. 8.1%; p < 0.001) and, therefore, had similar ratios of observed to expected rates of 30-day death (age ≥90 years vs. <90 years: 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.92 vs. 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 0.78). There were no differences in the rates of stroke, aortic valve reintervention, or myocardial infarction at 30 days or 1 year. Nonagenarians had lower (worse) median Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores at 30 days; however, there was no significant difference at 1 year.

Conclusions: In current U.S. clinical practice, approximately 16% of patients undergoing TAVR are ≥90 years of age. Although 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were statistically higher compared with younger patients undergoing TAVR, the absolute and relative differences were clinically modest. TAVR also improves quality of life to the same degree in nonagenarians as in younger patients. These data support safety and efficacy of TAVR in select very elderly patients.

Keywords: TAVI; TAVR; centenarians; elderly; quality of life; transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Adjusted age effects on post-discharge outcomes
Adjusted age effects on post-discharge outcomes after 30 days and 1-year. (HR = hazard ratio, MI = myocardial infarction)
Figure 2
Figure 2. Stroke
Cumulative incidence of stroke in nonagenarians and patients under age 90
Figure 3
Figure 3. Heart failure readmission
Cumulative incidence of heart failure readmission in nonagenarians and patients under age 90
Figure 4
Figure 4. Mortality
Cumulative incidence of mortality in nonagenarians and patients under age 90
Figure 5
Figure 5. Mortality compared to age-matched general population
1-year mortality observed versus age-matched general population

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vincent GKVV. The Next Four Decades: The Older Population in the United States 2010 to 2050. USC Bureau; Washington, DC: 2010.
    1. Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G, et al. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? European heart journal. 2005;26:2714–20. - PubMed
    1. Assmann A, Minol JP, Mehdiani A, Akhyari P, Boeken U, Lichtenberg A. Cardiac surgery in nonagenarians: not only feasible, but also reasonable? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;17:340–3. discussion 343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:e521–643. - PubMed
    1. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S1–44. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms