A Randomized Trial of Clindamycin Versus Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Uncomplicated Wound Infection
- PMID: 27025829
- PMCID: PMC4885652
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw177
A Randomized Trial of Clindamycin Versus Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Uncomplicated Wound Infection
Abstract
Background: With the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the United States, visits for skin infections greatly increased. Staphylococci and streptococci are considered predominant causes of wound infections. Clindamycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) are commonly prescribed, but the efficacy of TMP-SMX has been questioned.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, superiority trial at 5 US emergency departments. Patients >12 years of age with an uncomplicated wound infection received oral clindamycin 300 mg 4 times daily or TMP-SMX 320 mg/1600 mg twice daily, each for 7 days. We compared the primary outcome, wound infection cure at 7-14 days, and secondary outcomes through 6-8 weeks after treatment, in the per-protocol population.
Results: Subjects had a median age of 40 years (range, 14-76 years); 40.1% of wound specimens grew MRSA, 25.7% methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, and 5.0% streptococci. The wound infection was cured at 7-14 days in 187 of 203 (92.1%) clindamycin-treated and 182 of 198 (91.9%) TMP-SMX-treated subjects (difference, 0.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.8% to 6.2%; P = not significant). The clindamycin group had a significantly lower rate of recurrence at 7-14 days (1.5% vs 6.6%; difference, -5.1%; 95% CI, -9.4% to -.8%) and through 6-8 weeks following treatment (2.0% vs 7.1%; difference, -5.1%; 95% CI, -9.7% to -.6%). Other secondary outcomes were statistically similar between groups but tended to favor clindamycin. Adverse event rates were similar.
Conclusions: In settings where MRSA is prevalent, clindamycin and TMP-SMX produce similar cure and adverse event rates among patients with an uncomplicated wound infection. Further study evaluating differential effects of antibiotics on recurrent infection may be warranted.
Clinical trials registration: NCT00729937.
Keywords: clindamycin; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; randomized; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; wound infection.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of Cephalexin Plus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole vs Cephalexin Alone on Clinical Cure of Uncomplicated Cellulitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2017 May 23;317(20):2088-2096. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5653. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28535235 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clindamycin versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for uncomplicated skin infections.N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 19;372(12):1093-103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403789. N Engl J Med. 2015. PMID: 25785967 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Antibiotics for Smaller Skin Abscesses.N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2545-2555. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607033. N Engl J Med. 2017. PMID: 28657870 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as a viable treatment option for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Pharmacotherapy. 2005 Feb;25(2):253-64. doi: 10.1592/phco.25.2.253.56956. Pharmacotherapy. 2005. PMID: 15767239 Review.
-
Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 21;7(7):CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12:CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub5. PMID: 30030966 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Emerging Treatment Options for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Bloodstream Infections Caused by Staphylococcus aureus: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence.Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Apr 22;15:2137-2157. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S318322. eCollection 2022. Infect Drug Resist. 2022. PMID: 35498629 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Phenotypic Detection of Hemin-Inducible Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Heteroresistance in Staphylococcus aureus.Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0151021. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01510-21. Epub 2021 Oct 27. Microbiol Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34704796 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): updated guidelines from the UK.JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Feb 3;3(1):dlaa114. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa114. eCollection 2021 Mar. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021. PMID: 34223066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pathway with single-dose long-acting intravenous antibiotic reduces emergency department hospitalizations of patients with skin infections.Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;28(10):1108-1117. doi: 10.1111/acem.14258. Epub 2021 May 5. Acad Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 33780567 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019 Dec 5;7(1):1901872. doi: 10.1002/advs.201901872. eCollection 2020 Jan. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019. PMID: 31921562 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Pallin DJ, Egan DJ, Pelletier AJ, Espinola JA, Hooper DC, Camargo CA Jr. Increased US emergency department visits for skin and soft tissue infections, and changes in antibiotic choices, during the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 51:291–8. - PubMed
-
- Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ et al. . Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:666–74. - PubMed
-
- US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: developing drugs for treatment. US Food and Drug Administration. August 2010. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformati... Accessed 30 November 2015.
-
- Corey GR, Kabler H, Mehra P et al. . Single-dose oritavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin infections. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2180–90. - PubMed
-
- Boucher HW, Wilcox M, Talbot GH et al. . Once-weekly dalbavancin versus daily conventional therapy for skin infection. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2169–79. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
