Species-level persistence probabilities for recovery and conservation status assessment
- PMID: 27030933
- DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12728
Species-level persistence probabilities for recovery and conservation status assessment
Abstract
Recovery planning for species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act has been hampered by a lack of consistency and transparency, which can be improved by implementing a standardized approach for evaluating species status and developing measurable recovery criteria. However, managers lack an assessment method that integrates threat abatement and can be used when demographic data are limited. To help meet these needs, we demonstrated an approach for evaluating species status based on habitat configuration data. We applied 3 established persistence measures (patch occupancy, metapopulation capacity, and proportion of population lost) to compare 2 conservation strategies (critical habitat designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Forest Service's Carbonate Habitat Management Strategy) and 2 threat scenarios (maximum limestone mining, removal of all habitat in areas with mining claims; minimum mining, removal of habitat only in areas with existing operations and high-quality ore) against a baseline of existing habitat for 3 federally listed plant species. Protecting all area within the designated critical habitat maintained a similar level (83.9-99.9%) of species persistence as the baseline, whereas maximum mining greatly reduced persistence (0.51-38.4% maintained). The 3 persistence measures provided complementary insights reflecting different aspects of habitat availability (total area, number of patches, patch size, and connectivity). These measures can be used to link recovery criteria developed following the 3 R principles (representation, redundancy, and resilience) to the resulting improvements in species viability. By focusing on amount and distribution of habitat, our method provides a means of assessing the status of data-poor species to inform decision making under the Endangered Species Act.
Keywords: 3 Rs; Acta de Especies en Peligro; Endangered Species Act; extinction risk; planificación de la recuperación; recovery planning; resilience; resiliencia; riesgo de extinción; tres Rs.
© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.
Similar articles
-
Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species.Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):482-92. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12428. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Conserv Biol. 2015. PMID: 25472827
-
A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.Conserv Biol. 2014 Feb;28(1):33-43. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12155. Epub 2013 Sep 20. Conserv Biol. 2014. PMID: 24112040 Review.
-
Developing metapopulation connectivity criteria from genetic and habitat data to recover the endangered Mexican wolf.Conserv Biol. 2014 Feb;28(1):76-86. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12156. Epub 2013 Sep 20. Conserv Biol. 2014. PMID: 24112074
-
Actual and potential use of population viability analyses in recovery of plant species listed under the US endangered species act.Conserv Biol. 2013 Dec;27(6):1265-78. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12130. Epub 2013 Aug 23. Conserv Biol. 2013. PMID: 24033732 Review.
-
Incorporating climate science in applications of the US endangered species act for aquatic species.Conserv Biol. 2013 Dec;27(6):1222-33. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12166. Conserv Biol. 2013. PMID: 24299088
Cited by
-
Behavioural Psychology of Unique Family Firms Toward R&D Investment in the Digital Era: The Role of Ownership Discrepancy.Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:928447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928447. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35967673 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
