Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0151460.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151460. eCollection 2016.

The Impact of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Health and Health Care Costs: A Modelling Study

Affiliations
Free PMC article

The Impact of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Health and Health Care Costs: A Modelling Study

J Lennert Veerman et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

This paper aims to estimate the consequences of an additional 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) on health and health care expenditure. Participants were adult (aged > = 20) Australians alive in 2010, who were modelled over their remaining lifetime. We used lifetable-based epidemiological modelling to examine the potential impact of a 20% valoric tax on SSBs on total lifetime disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), incidence, prevalence, and mortality of obesity-related disease, and health care expenditure. Over the lifetime of adult Australian alive in 2010, seemingly modest estimated changes in average body mass as a result of the SSB tax translated to gains of 112,000 health-adjusted life years for men (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 73,000-155,000) and 56,000 (95% UI: 36,000-76,000) for women, and a reduction in overall health care expenditure of AUD609 million (95% UI: 368 million- 870 million). The tax is estimated to reduce the number of new type 2 diabetes cases by approximately 800 per year. Twenty-five years after the introduction of the tax, there would be 4,400 fewer prevalent cases of heart disease and 1,100 fewer persons living with the consequences of stroke, and an estimated 1606 extra people would be alive as a result of the tax. The tax would generate an estimated AUD400 million in revenue each year. Governments should consider increasing the tax on sugared drinks. This would improve population health, reduce health care costs, as well as bring in direct revenue.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Two of the authors (JM, NA) are employed by the Obesity Policy Coalition.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Annual number of health adjusted life years gained over time after implementation of a 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks in Australia.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Projected annual number of new cases of disease prevented over time after implementation of a 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks in Australia.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Projected number of existing (prevalent) cases of disease prevented over time after implementation of a 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks in Australia.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Projected number of deaths prevented over time after implementation of a 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks in Australia, by cause of death.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Health care cost savings over time after implementation of a 20% tax on sugared drinks in Australia.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 23 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Burden of Disease Country Profile Australia. Seattle (WA, USA): 2013.
    1. World Health Organization. 2008–2013 Action plan for the global strategy for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases Geneva: WHO, 2008.
    1. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Using price policies to promote healthier diets. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2015.
    1. Thow AM, Downs S, Jan S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of food taxes and subsidies to improve diets: understanding the recent evidence. Nutrition reviews. 2014;72(9):551–65. 10.1111/nure.12123 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Villanueva T. European nations launch tax attack on unhealthy foods. CMAJ. 2011;183(17):E1229–30. 10.1503/cmaj.109-4031 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Grant support

This work was supported by the Obesity Policy Coalition and by NHMRC funding for the Centre for Research Excellence in Obesity Policy and Food Systems (APP1041020). GS is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (project number DE160100307). Two of the authors (JM, NA) are employed by the Obesity Policy Coalition. The NHMRC was not involved in the study or the reporting.

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback