Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 1;73(6):721-32.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0580.

Association Between Anticholinergic Medication Use and Cognition, Brain Metabolism, and Brain Atrophy in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

Affiliations

Association Between Anticholinergic Medication Use and Cognition, Brain Metabolism, and Brain Atrophy in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

Shannon L Risacher et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Abstract

Importance: The use of anticholinergic (AC) medication is linked to cognitive impairment and an increased risk of dementia. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between AC medication use and neuroimaging biomarkers of brain metabolism and atrophy as a proxy for understanding the underlying biology of the clinical effects of AC medications.

Objective: To assess the association between AC medication use and cognition, glucose metabolism, and brain atrophy in cognitively normal older adults from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and the Indiana Memory and Aging Study (IMAS).

Design, setting, and participants: The ADNI and IMAS are longitudinal studies with cognitive, neuroimaging, and other data collected at regular intervals in clinical and academic research settings. For the participants in the ADNI, visits are repeated 3, 6, and 12 months after the baseline visit and then annually. For the participants in the IMAS, visits are repeated every 18 months after the baseline visit (402 cognitively normal older adults in the ADNI and 49 cognitively normal older adults in the IMAS were included in the present analysis). Participants were either taking (hereafter referred to as the AC+ participants [52 from the ADNI and 8 from the IMAS]) or not taking (hereafter referred to as the AC- participants [350 from the ADNI and 41 from the IMAS]) at least 1 medication with medium or high AC activity. Data analysis for this study was performed in November 2015.

Main outcomes and measures: Cognitive scores, mean fludeoxyglucose F 18 standardized uptake value ratio (participants from the ADNI only), and brain atrophy measures from structural magnetic resonance imaging were compared between AC+ participants and AC- participants after adjusting for potential confounders. The total AC burden score was calculated and was related to target measures. The association of AC use and longitudinal clinical decline (mean [SD] follow-up period, 32.1 [24.7] months [range, 6-108 months]) was examined using Cox regression.

Results: The 52 AC+ participants (mean [SD] age, 73.3 [6.6] years) from the ADNI showed lower mean scores on Weschler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory Immediate Recall (raw mean scores: 13.27 for AC+ participants and 14.16 for AC- participants; P = .04) and the Trail Making Test Part B (raw mean scores: 97.85 seconds for AC+ participants and 82.61 seconds for AC- participants; P = .04) and a lower executive function composite score (raw mean scores: 0.58 for AC+ participants and 0.78 for AC- participants; P = .04) than the 350 AC- participants (mean [SD] age, 73.3 [5.8] years) from the ADNI. Reduced total cortical volume and temporal lobe cortical thickness and greater lateral ventricle and inferior lateral ventricle volumes were seen in the AC+ participants relative to the AC- participants.

Conclusions and relevance: The use of AC medication was associated with increased brain atrophy and dysfunction and clinical decline. Thus, use of AC medication among older adults should likely be discouraged if alternative therapies are available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Dr Farlow reports grant research support from Accera, Biogen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Roche, Lundbeck, Chase Pharmaceuticals, and Boehringer-Ingelheim and being a consultant for or on the advisory or data and safety monitoring boards of Accera, Alltech, Avanir, Biogen, Eisai Medical Research Inc, FORUM Pharmaceuticals, Genentech Inc, Grifols, Helicon Inc Research, Lundbeck, Medavante, Medivation Inc, Merck and Company Inc, Medtronic, Neurotrope Biosciences, Novartis, Pfizer, QR Pharma, Axovant Sciences Inc, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering-Plough, Takeda, Toyama Pharmaceutical, Pharm, Eli Lilly and Company, and UCB Pharma. Dr Petersen serves on the advisory boards of Pfizer Inc and Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy and is a consultant for Roche Incorporated, Merck, Genentech, and Biogen. He receives support from the National Institute on Aging (grants U01-AG006786, P50-AGG016574, R01-AG011378, and U01-AG024904) and publishing royalties from Oxford University Press. Dr Jack serves as a consultant for Eli Lilly and Company and receives research support from the National Institute on Aging (grants R01 AG11378 and R01 AG041851) and the Alexander Family Alzheimer’s Disease Research Professorship of the Mayo Foundation. Dr Jagust serves on the scientific advisory boards of Genentech and Banner/ Genentech and was a consultant for Synarc, Siemens Medical, Genentech, F. Hoffman–La Roche, and Novartis. He receives research support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, the Rainwater Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grants AG034570, AG025303, AG044292, AG012345, AG021028, AG031563, AG019724, AG030048, AG032306, and AG024904). Dr Aisen serves on the scientific advisory boards of Novartis and Biogen and has been a consultant for Elan Corporation, Wyeth, Eisai Inc, Schering-Plough Corp, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Roche, Amgen, Genentech Inc, Abbott, Pfizer Inc, Novartis, Bayer, Medivation Inc, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas, Bainippon, Biomarin, Solvay, Ostuka, AstraZeneca, and Janssen. He receives research support from Baxter, Pfizer, Janssen, and Eli Lilly and Company, as well as from the National Institute on Aging (grants U01-AG10483, U01 AG024904, R01 AG030048, and R01 AG16381). Dr Weiner serves on the scientific advisory boards for Pfizer, BOLT International, Neurotrope Bioscience, Eli Lilly and Company, the University of Pennsylvania’s Neuroscience of Behavior Initiative, the National Brain Research Centre, India, and the ADNI and is a consultant for Synarc, Pfizer, Janssen, KLJ Associates, Easton Associates, Harvard University, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Clearview Healthcare Partners, Perceptive Informatics, Smartfish AS, Decision Resources Inc, Neurotrope Bioscience, Araclon, Merck, Defined Health, and Genentech. He receives research support from Avid Radiopharmceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, the NIH, the US Department of Defense, and the Veterans Administration. He also has received travel funding or speaker honoraria from Pfizer, Paul Sabatier University, the MCI Group France, eDreams, the Neuroscience School of Advanced Studies, Danone Trading, BV, CTAD ANT Congrès, Kenes International, the Aging and Disability Resource Center, UCLA, the University of California, San Diego, the Sanofi-Aventis Group, University Center Hospital, Toulouse, Araclon, AC Immune, Eli Lilly and Company, the New York Academy of Sciences, the National Brain Research Center, Indiana for Johns Hopkins Medicine, the Consortium for Multiple Sclerosis Centers, Northwestern University, and the University of Pennsylvania. Dr Saykin serves on scientific advisory boards of Siemens Healthcare and Eli Lilly and Company and was a consultant for Baxter Bioscience, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer Inc, Siemens Healthcare, Dartmouth Medical School, the University of Michigan, the University of Vermont, Vanderbilt University, and Brigham and Women’s Hospital/ Massachusetts General Hospital. He has received research support from Siemens Medical Solutions, Welch Allyn Inc, the Foundation for the NIH, and the NIH (grants R01 AG19771, R01 CA101318, R01 LM011360, RC2 AG036535, P30 AG10133, and U01 AG032984). He has also received travel support and/or speaker honoraria from Siemens Healthcare. No other disclosures are reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Association of Anticholinergic (AC) Medication Use With Cognition and Glucose Metabolism Among Participants From the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)
Cognitively normal older adults taking 1 or more medications with medium or high AC activity (referred to as AC+ participants [n = 52]) showed poorer cognition than those not taking these medications (referred to as AC participants [n = 350]), including a lower score on the Weschler Memory Scale–Revised Logical Memory Immediate Recall (P = .04 [A]), the Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) (P = .04 [B]), and an executive function composite (P = .04, with transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, and diabetes as additional covariates [C]). Glucose hypometabolism, as measured by the fluorodeoxyglucose F 18–positron emission tomographic (FDG-PET) standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), was also observed in the bilateral hippocampus (P = .02, with anxiety as an additional covariate [D]) and in a global cortical region of interest of AC+ participants (n = 43) relative to AC participants (n = 286), generated from an analysis of cognitively normal participants who show greater glucose metabolism than participants with AD from the full ADNI 1 cohort (P = .03, with other vascular conditions and concussion as additional covariates [E]). Error bars indicate SD.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effect of Anticholinergic (AC) Medication Use on Brain Atrophy Measures
Cognitively normal older adults taking 1 or more medications with medium or high anticholinergic activity (referred to as AC+ participants [n = 35]) showed more brain atrophy than participants not taking these medications (referred to as AC participants [n = 251]). Reduced total cortex volume (P = .02 [A]), increased bilateral lateral ventricle volume (P = .01 [B]), and increased inferior lateral ventricle volume (P < .001 [C]) were observed in AC+ participants relative to AC participants. Furthermore, reduced bilateral temporal lobe (P = .02, with concussion as an additional covariate [D]) and medial temporal lobe (P = .02, with concussion and cardiac surgery as additional covariates [E]) cortical thicknesses were also observed. Error bars indicate SD.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Association of Total Anticholinergic (AC) Burden Score and Brain Atrophy
The total AC burden score was significantly associated with both cognition and brain atrophy. Specifically, a higher total AC burden score was associated with poorer performance on the Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) (r = 0.137; P = .01, with transient ischemic attack and total number of medications as additional covariates [A]) and greater inferior lateral ventricle (r = 0.126; P = .03 [B]) and lateral ventricle volumes (r = 0.145; P = .01 [C]). Inferior lateral ventricle volume was still significantly associated with the total AC burden score after excluding participants with a total AC burden score of 0 (r = 0.331; P < .001 [E]). The TMT-B score (r = 0.146; P = .06 [D]) and lateral ventricle volume showed nonsignificant trend associations with the total AC burden score after excluding those with a total AC burden score of 0 (r = 0.152; P = .10 [F]).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Effect of Anticholinergic (AC) Medication Use on Clinical Conversion
A, A significant association between AC use and future progression of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants to mild cognitive impairment and/or Alzheimer disease was observed (P = .01; hazard ratio [HR], 2.47; with total number of medications, cardiac surgery, total number of comorbid conditions, and other psychiatric conditions as additional covariates). B, When evaluating the interaction between AC use and Aβ positivity, we found that participants taking 1 or more medications with medium or high AC activity who are positive for Aβ on florbetapir F-18–positron emission tomographic (PET) scans or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples (referred to as AC+ and Aβ+ participants) showed a higher risk of conversion relative to participants not taking these medications who are negative for Aβ on florbetapir F-18–PET scans or CSF samples (referred to as AC and Aβ participants) (P < .001; HR, 7.73; with cardiac surgery and other psychiatric conditions as additional covariates) and participants who are positive for either AC use or Aβ (P = .001; HR, 4.24).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ancelin ML, Artero S, Portet F, Dupuy AM, Touchon J, Ritchie K. Non-degenerative mild cognitive impairment in elderly people and use of anticholinergic drugs: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2006;332(7539):455–459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bottiggi KA, Salazar JC, Yu L, et al. Long-term cognitive impact of anticholinergic medications in older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14(11):980–984. - PubMed
    1. Boustani M, Campbell N, Munger S, Maidment I, Fox C. Impact of anticholinergics on the aging brain: a review and practical application. Aging Health. 2008;4(3):311–320.
    1. Cai X, Campbell N, Khan B, Callahan C, Boustani M. Long-term anticholinergic use and the aging brain. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(4):377–385. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell N, Boustani M, Limbil T, et al. The cognitive impact of anticholinergics: a clinical review. Clin Interv Aging. 2009;4:225–233. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms