Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Feb;8(1):33-46.
doi: 10.1007/s12975-016-0467-5. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke

Jessica M Cassidy  1 , Steven C Cramer  2   3   4   5
Affiliations
Review

Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke

Jessica M Cassidy et al. Transl Stroke Res. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

With increasing rates of survival throughout the past several years, stroke remains one of the leading causes of adult disability. Following the onset of stroke, spontaneous mechanisms of recovery at the cellular, molecular, and systems levels ensue. The degree of spontaneous recovery is generally incomplete and variable among individuals. Typically, the best recovery outcomes entail the restitution of function in injured but surviving neural matter. An assortment of restorative therapies exists or is under development with the goal of potentiating restitution of function in damaged areas or in nearby ipsilesional regions by fostering neuroplastic changes, which often rely on mechanisms similar to those observed during spontaneous recovery. Advancements in stroke rehabilitation depend on the elucidation of both spontaneous and therapeutic-driven mechanisms of recovery. Further, the implementation of neural biomarkers in research and clinical settings will enable a multimodal approach to probing brain state and predicting the extent of post-stroke functional recovery. This review will discuss spontaneous and therapeutic-induced mechanisms driving post-stroke functional recovery while underscoring several potential restorative therapies and biomarkers.

Keywords: Biomarker; Neuroimaging; Plasticity; Rehabilitation; Repair; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Cassidy has no conflicts of interest. Dr. Cramer served as a consultant for Dart Neuroscience, RAND Corporation, Dart Neuroscience, and MicroTransponder.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):e28–e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2012 Update A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125(1):e2–e220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rathore SS, Hinn AR, Cooper LS, Tyroler HA, Rosamond WD. Characterization of incident stroke signs and symptoms: findings from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Stroke. 2002;33(11):2718–21. - PubMed
    1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000087172.16305.cd. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke. 2013;8(1):25–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00967.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types