Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 4;90(3):635-48.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 Apr 21.

The Basal Forebrain and Motor Cortex Provide Convergent yet Distinct Movement-Related Inputs to the Auditory Cortex

Affiliations

The Basal Forebrain and Motor Cortex Provide Convergent yet Distinct Movement-Related Inputs to the Auditory Cortex

Anders Nelson et al. Neuron. .

Abstract

Cholinergic inputs to the auditory cortex from the basal forebrain (BF) are important to auditory processing and plasticity, but little is known about the organization of these synapses onto different auditory cortical neuron types, how they influence auditory responsiveness, and their activity patterns during various behaviors. Using intersectional tracing, optogenetic circuit mapping, and in vivo calcium imaging, we found that cholinergic axons arising from the caudal BF target major excitatory and inhibitory auditory cortical cell types, rapidly modulate auditory cortical tuning, and display fast movement-related activity. Furthermore, the BF and the motor cortex-another source of movement-related activity-provide convergent input onto some of the same auditory cortical neurons. Cholinergic and motor cortical afferents to the auditory cortex display distinct activity patterns and presynaptic partners, indicating that the auditory cortex integrates bottom-up cholinergic signals related to ongoing movements and arousal with top-down information concerning impending movements and motor planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cholinergic SIn Neurons Target the Major Cell Types of ACtx
(A-C) Overview of the rabies-based monosynaptic, presynaptic tracing strategy. (A) On day 0, AAV-FLEX-RG and AAV-FLEX-TVA.mCherry were injected into ACtx of a Cre driver mouse, in this case PV-Cre. (B) On day 14, EnVA-R∆G.GFP was injected into ACtx, which labeled neurons presynaptic to PV cells expressing TVA and RG (C). (D) GFP and mCherry labeling in ACtx. (E) Inset from (D) showing GFP+, mCherry+, and double-labeled neurons. (F) GFP+ neurons (presynaptic to PV neurons in ACtx) in MGB. (G) GFP+ neurons in contralateral ACtx. (H) GFP+ neurons in SIn. The lower left inset diagrams the target of SIn neurons for this experiment. The upper right inset indicates the location of SInACtx labeling on a coronal brain slice (from Paxinos & Franklin). (I-K) Top panels indicate the location and target cell type of the GFP+ labeling in lower panels. (L) The coronal brain coordinates for SInACtx neurons presynaptic to four cell types of ACtx, relative to a common midline landmark and normalized by brain slice size (n = 2 mice for each plot). The color code indicates rostral-caudal location of labeled neurons. (M) Locations of SIn neurons targeting different ACtx cell types superimposed on a generalized coronal brain slice (n = 8 mice total). (N) ChAT immunolabeling in GFP+ SIn neurons targeting PV+ ACtx neurons. Double-labeled SInACtx neurons (SInACh neurons are indicated with arrowheads). Panels to the right show GFP+ neurons (top), ChAT+ neurons (middle), and overlaid images (bottom). (O) Percent ChAT+GFP+ SIn neurons for each target ACtx cell type (CaMKII, n = 3; PV, n = 2; VIP, n = 3; SST, n = 3). (n.s. p > 0.05). Values are mean ± SEM.
Figure 2
Figure 2. SInACh Neurons evoke excitatory and inhibitory currents in ACtx neurons
(A) Schematic of the experimental strategy. AAV-FLEX-ChR2-GFP was injected into SIn of ChAT-Cre mice. Whole-cell voltage clamp recordings were made from acute coronal ACtx brain slices while photostimulating ChR2-expressing SInACh axons. (B-D) Immunoreactive ChR2-expressing SInACh axons (green) around a pyramidal neuron labeled following whole-cell recording (red). (B) Axons surrounding the soma. (C) Axons surrounding the proximal trunk dendrite. (D) Axons surrounding a segment of apical dendrite in layer 1 of cortex. (E-H) Average (4 trials each) excitatory and inhibitory currents evoked in a pyramidal neuron through stimulation of SInACh axons in normal ACSF (nACSF, E), ACSF containing NBQX, AP5, & atropine (F), NBQX, AP5, atropine, and GBZ (G), or NBQX, AP5, atropine, GBZ, and mecamylamine (H). (I) Peak excitatory and inhibitory currents evoked through stimulation of SInACh axons in various pharmacological conditions for a population of neurons. (J) Onset times for excitatory and inhibitory currents (n = 12 neurons from 7 mice). The inset depicts at higher magnification a neuron's response to SInACh stimulation at holding potentials of −70mV (grey) and 0mV (black). (K) Grand average of excitatory currents evoked through stimulation of SInACh axons after applying NBQX, AP5, atropine, and GBZ. Lighter shade traces represent SEM (n = 8 neurons. Values are mean ± SEM.
Figure 3
Figure 3. SInACh Neurons Depolarize ACtx Neurons
(A) Schematic of the experimental strategy. AAV-FLEX-ChR2-GFP was injected into SIn of ChAT-Cre mice. Sharp intracellular current clamp recordings were made from mice while photostimulating ChR2-expressing SInACh axons and playing sounds. The insets show ChR2-expressing SInACh axons (green) around a pyramidal neuron labeled following intracellular recording (red). (B) Average response (20 trials, blue trace) to photostimulating SInACh axons (blue shaded bar) for an example neuron. The black trace shows average response to blank stimulation trials. (C) Average voltage area following stimulation of SInACh axons or blank trials for the example neuron in (B). (D) Average spike count following stimulation of SInACh axons or blank trials for the example neuron in (B). (E) Grand average intracellular response to stimulation of SInACh axons (n = 10 neurons from 3 mice). Shaded bounds indicate SEM. (F) Population depiction of evoked voltage area. The blue data points indicate the population mean and SEM. (G) Average response (40 trials) to tone playback alone (black trace) or tone playback with simultaneous photostimulation of SInACh axons (blue trace) for the example neuron. (H) Mean voltage area in response to tone playback alone (black) or tone playback with stimulation of SInACh axons (blue) for the example neuron. (I) Mean spiking response to tone playback alone (black) or tone playback with stimulation of SInACh axons (blue) for the example neuron. (J) Grand average intracellular response to tone playback alone (black) or tone playback with stimulation of SInACh axons (blue). Lighter shades depict SEM. (K) Population depiction of voltage area evoked to tone presentation alone or with stimulation of SInACh axons. The blue data points indicate the population mean and SEM. Values are mean ± SEM.
Figure 4
Figure 4. SInACh Neurons Facilitate Weak and Suppress Strong Auditory Responses
(A) Schematic of the experimental strategy. AAV-FLEX-ChR2-GFP was injected into SIn of ChAT-Cre mice. Multielectrode extracellular recordings were made from ACtx while photostimulating ChR2-expressing SInACh axons and playing sounds. (B) Raster plots for an isolated single unit in response to tone playback (2 kHz, blue or 4 kHz, orange) alone (bottom half), or with photostimulation of SInACh axons (top half). The blue shaded box indicates the light stimulation period. (C) Peristimulus time histograms of response strength (RS) to tone stimulation alone (solid blue/orange traces), or tone + light stimulation (dashed blue/orange traces). (D) Tuning curve for the example unit without (solid trace) or with (dashed trace) stimulation of SInACh axons. (E) Tone RS without light plotted against tone RS with light, for a single experiment. All significantly driven tone responses for each unit are included as individual data points. On average, tone responses are facilitated with light (p = 0.0058). The lighter blue shading indicates the functional prediction bounds for the linear regression. (F) Population tuning curve without (black) and with (blue) light stimulation (data are from 5 mice). (G) Population tone RS plotted against population tone + light RS for each group of responses (± 0, 1, 2, 3 octaves from peak response). The blue line is the linear fit. Values are mean ± SEM.
Figure 5
Figure 5. SInACh Axons in ACtx are Active During Movements
(A) Schematic of the experimental strategy. AAV-FLEX-GCaMP6s was injected into SIn of ChAT-Cre mice. (B) Confocal micrograph of GCaMP-labeled SIn neurons. Neurons expressing GCaMP expressed ChAT (red). (C) Confocal micrograph of GCaMP-expressing SInACh axons in ACtx. (D) Outline of experimental design for 2 photon imaging and tracking movements. ROIs for monitoring body movements are indicated with dashed boxes. (E) Average fluorescence of a GCaMP-labeled axon, imaged in vivo. The region outlined with a green dashed line indicates the ROI for monitoring changes in fluorescence over time. (F) Pseudocolored axonal fluorescence during rest. (G) Pseudocolored axonal fluorescence during a body movement. (H) ∆F/F from a single ROI (blue trace) during movements and rest (red trace). The dashed line indicates the threshold for identifying movements. (I) ∆F/F during paw movements (n = 12 axons, 2 mice). (J) ∆F/F during mouth movements (n = 12 axons, 2 mice). (K) ∆F/F during all body movements (n = 14 axons, 3 mice). (**p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Values are mean ± SEM.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Movement-Related SInACh Activity Precedes Pupil Microdilations
(A) Outline of experimental design for 2 photon imaging, tracking movements, and monitoring pupil size. (B) Changes in pupil size across time. Representative images from dilated, constricted, and microdilation periods are shown above. The dashed white circle corresponds to the size of the constricted pupil, while the orange circles illustrate the relative dilations. (C) ∆F/F from a single axon (blue) and pupil size (purple) during an epoch of small body movements (red). The lighter purple trace shows the unfiltered pupil size. (D) Cross correlation between ∆F/F of 9 ROIs and pupil microdilations. The lag between ∆F/F and pupil is indicated by the dashed orange line relative to time zero. The inset shows GCaMP labeling in SInACh axons, and the ROIs selected for analysis. (E) Cross correlation between ∆F/F of the same ROIs from (D) and movement quantification. (F-G) Average and SEM of ∆F/F (blue trace, n = 14 imaging planes, 1 axon from each; 4 mice) and pupil area (purple trace, n = 5 imaging sessions, 2 mice) plotted with respect to movement onset (F) and movement offset (G). Values are mean ± SEM (shading), except for the horizontal error bars in (F), which represent SD.
Figure 7
Figure 7. SInACh and M2ACtx Synapses Converge on Single Auditory Cortical Neurons
(A) Schematic of the experimental strategy. AAV-FLEX-GFP was injected into SIn of ChAT-Cre mice. AAV-tdTomato was injected into the M2 of the same mice. (B) Confocal micrograph showing GFP labeling at the injection side. Blue is DAPI. The inset shows the injection site, immunostained for ChAT (red). (C) tdTomato labeling at the M2 injection site. (D) Labeling from SInACh (green) and M2ACtx (red) axons in ACtx. The inset shows the fluorescence intensity of SInACh and M2ACtx labeling across layers (averaged measurements from several brain sections). (E) Higher magnification Z stack showing SInACh and M2ACtx axons near a putative cell body (asterisk). (F) Higher magnification image from (E). The Z stack was interpolated and rotated slightly. Nicotinic ACh receptors are labeled with ɑ-bungarotoxin (greyscale). (G) Another Z stack showing SInACh and M2ACtx axons near a cell body from a different mouse. DNA is labeled with DAPI. (H) Higher magnification Z stack from (G). (I) Schematic of the experimental strategy. AAV-FLEX-ChR2-GFP was injected into SIn of ChAT-Cre mice. AAVChR2-GFP was injected into the M2 of the same mice. Whole-cell voltage clamp recordings were made from acute coronal ACtx brain slices. (J) Confocal Z stack showing a pyramidal neuron labeled following whole-cell recording surrounded by ChR2-expressing axons. (K) Average traces of excitatory currents (5 neurons) in response to photostimulation of putative SInACh and M2ACtx axons in normal ACSF (blue) and following application of blockers (orange; the shading indicates SEM). Nicotinic transmission is preserved after blocking glutamatergic M2ACtx currents. (L) Onset (blue) and offset (magenta) time constants of excitatory currents from (J).
Figure 8
Figure 8. Synaptic Inputs to SInACtx Neurons
(A) Schematic of the experimental strategy. On day 0, AAV-FLEX-RG and AAV-FLEX-TVA.mCherry were injected into SIn of wild type mice. Additionally, CAV-Cre was injected into ipsilateral ACtx. On Day 14, EnVA-R∆G.GFP is injected into SIn, which labeled neurons presynaptic to SInACtx cells expressing TVA and RG. (B) GFP and TVA.mCherry labeling in SIn. (C) GFP-labeled SIn neurons. (D) TVA.mCherry-labeled SInACtx neurons. (E) Overlaid images from (C) and (D). Neurons expressing both GFP and TVA.mCherry are starter cells. Neurons expressing GFP, but not mCherry, are putatively presynaptic to SInACtx neurons. (F) A subset of SIn neurons putatively presynaptic to SInACtx neurons stained positive for NPY (white arrowheads). The panels to the right show GFP (top), NPY (middle), and TVA.mCherry (bottom) labeling. The white arrowheads indicate a putative presynaptic (GFP+/TVA.mCherry) neuron expressing NPY. The open yellow arrowhead indicates a starter cell (GFP+/TVA.mCherry+) not expressing NPY. (G-O) Neurons presynaptic to SIn neurons in cuneiform nucleus (G), peripeduncular nucleus and suprageniculate nucleus (H), periaqueductal gray (I), locus coeruleus (J), raphe (K), hypothalamus (N), and frontal cortex (O).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnault P, Roger M. The connections of the peripeduncular area studied by retrograde and anterograde transport in the rat. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1987;258:463–476. - PubMed
    1. Arroyo S, Bennett C, Aziz D, Brown S, Hestrin S. Prolonged disynaptic inhibition in the cortex mediated by slow, non-α7 nicotinic excitation of a specific subset of cortical interneurons. The Journal of neuroscience. 2012;32:3859–3864. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of locus coeruleusnorepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2005;28:403–450. - PubMed
    1. Bakin JS, Weinberger NM. Induction of a physiological memory in the cerebral cortex by stimulation of the nucleus basalis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;93:11219–11224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Budinger E, Laszcz A, Lison H, Scheich H, Ohl F. Non-sensory cortical and subcortical connections of the primary auditory cortex in Mongolian gerbils: bottom-up and top-down processing of neuronal information via field AI. Brain Research. 2008;1220:2–32. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources