Right ventricular remodeling and updated left ventricular geometry classification: is there any relationship?

Blood Press. 2016 Oct;25(5):292-7. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2016.1172868. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to evaluate right ventricular (RV) structure and function in hypertensive patients with various left ventricular (LV) geometric patterns using an updated classification for LV geometry.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 232 hypertensive subjects. All the subjects underwent complete two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic examination. Using LV mass index, LV end-diastolic diameter and relative wall thickness, according to the updated classification, all subjects were divided into six different groups: normal LV geometry, concentric remodeling, eccentric LV hypertrophy (LVH), concentric, dilated, and concentric-dilated LVH.

Results: RV wall thickness was increased in concentric and concentric-dilated LVH compared with normal LV geometry and LV concentric remodeling. RV longitudinal function was reduced in concentric and concentric-dilated patients compared with other hypertensive groups. 3D RV volumes were significantly higher in eccentric, dilated, and concentric-dilated LVH hypertensive subjects. Conversely, 3D RV ejection fraction was lower in these groups.

Conclusion: RV longitudinal myocardial function and 3D RV function are significantly influenced by LV geometry in hypertensive patients. RV remodeling is the most pronounced in the patients with concentric, dilated, and concentric-dilated LVH geometric patterns.

Keywords: Hypertension; left ventricular geometry; right ventricle; three-dimensional echocardiography; two-dimensional strain.

Publication types

  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Echocardiography
  • Heart Ventricles
  • Humans
  • Hypertension*
  • Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular
  • Ventricular Remodeling*