Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;87:233-236.
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 May 5.

Can Air Pollution Negate the Health Benefits of Cycling and Walking?

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Can Air Pollution Negate the Health Benefits of Cycling and Walking?

Marko Tainio et al. Prev Med. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Active travel (cycling, walking) is beneficial for the health due to increased physical activity (PA). However, active travel may increase the intake of air pollution, leading to negative health consequences. We examined the risk-benefit balance between active travel related PA and exposure to air pollution across a range of air pollution and PA scenarios. The health effects of active travel and air pollution were estimated through changes in all-cause mortality for different levels of active travel and air pollution. Air pollution exposure was estimated through changes in background concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), ranging from 5 to 200μg/m3. For active travel exposure, we estimated cycling and walking from 0 up to 16h per day, respectively. These refer to long-term average levels of active travel and PM2.5 exposure. For the global average urban background PM2.5 concentration (22μg/m3) benefits of PA by far outweigh risks from air pollution even under the most extreme levels of active travel. In areas with PM2.5 concentrations of 100μg/m3, harms would exceed benefits after 1h 30min of cycling per day or more than 10h of walking per day. If the counterfactual was driving, rather than staying at home, the benefits of PA would exceed harms from air pollution up to 3h 30min of cycling per day. The results were sensitive to dose-response function (DRF) assumptions for PM2.5 and PA. PA benefits of active travel outweighed the harm caused by air pollution in all but the most extreme air pollution concentrations.

Keywords: Air pollution; Bicycling; Health Impact Assessment; Mortality; Physical activity; Risk–Benefit Assessment; Walking.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of tipping point and break-even point as measured by the relative risk (RR) for all-cause mortality (ACM) combining the effects of air pollution (at 50 μg/m3 PM2.5) and physical activity (cycling).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Tipping and break-even points for different levels of cycling (red dashed line and blue solid line, respectively) (minutes per day, x-axis) and for different background PM2.5 concentrations (y-axis). Green lines represent the average and 99th percentile background PM2.5 concentrations in World Health Organization (WHO) Ambient Air Pollution Database (World Health Organization (WHO), 2014).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 40 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ainsworth B.E., Haskell W.L., Herrmann S.D. 2011 compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575–1581. - PubMed
    1. Andersen Z.J., de Nazelle A., Mendez M.A. A study of the combined effects of physical activity and air pollution on mortality in elderly urban residents: the Danish diet, cancer, and health cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015;123(6):557–563. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burnett R.T., Pope C.A., Ezzati M. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014;122(4):397–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Nazelle A., Rodríguez D.A., Crawford-Brown D. The built environment and health: impacts of pedestrian-friendly designs on air pollution exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2009;407(8):2525–2535. - PubMed
    1. Doorley R., Pakrashi V., Ghosh B. Quantifying the health impacts of active travel: assessment of methodologies. Transp. Rev. July 2015;2015:1–24.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Feedback