Estimation of Potential Savings Through Therapeutic Substitution
- PMID: 27159226
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1704
Estimation of Potential Savings Through Therapeutic Substitution
Abstract
Importance: Therapeutic substitution offers potential to decrease pharmaceutical expenditures and potentially improve the efficiency of the health care system.
Objective: To estimate potential savings through therapeutic substitution in terms of both overall and out-of-pocket expenditures of branded drugs when a generic in the same class with the same indication was available.
Design, setting, and participants: Repeated cross-sectional study using the 107 132 individuals included in the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2010-2012) along with their reported prescribed medicine use. The Orange Book, company financial statements, US Food and Drug Administration records, and published research were used for adjunctive information.
Main outcomes and measures: Estimated excess expenditure due to branded drug overuse when a lower-cost generic in the same class with the same indication was available.
Results: The study included 107 132 individuals between 2010 and 2012, of whom 62.1% (95% CI, 61.4%-62.8%) reported use of any prescribed medicine. A total of 31.5% (95% CI, 30.7%-32.2%) used a medication from an included drug class, whereas 16.6% (95% CI, 16.0%-17.1%) of the population used a branded drug from the included classes compared with 24.0% (95% CI, 23.4%-24.7%) who used a generic and 9.1% (95% CI, 8.7%-9.4%) who used both. In the included drug classes, the majority of the drugs were generics, with a total of 93.5 billion standardized doses compared with 47.4 billion standardized doses of branded drugs. Total expenditure of the branded drugs accounted for $147 (95% CI, $137-$156) billion compared with $62.7 (95% CI, $58.9-$66.5) billion for the generics. Between 2010 and 2012, an estimated $73.0 (95% CI, $67.6-$78.5) billion in total excess expenditure and $24.6 (95% CI, $22.6-$26.5) billion in out-of-pocket excess expenditure was attributable to branded drug overuse. The excess was present across numerous drug classes throughout many aspects of medicine and equates to 9.6% of total and 14.1% of out-of-pocket prescribed medicine expenses. The drug classes with the highest excess expenditure included statins ($10.9 [SE, $0.41] billion), atypical antipsychotics ($9.99 [SE, $1.03] billion), proton pump inhibitors ($6.12 [SE, $0.38] billion), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ($6.08 [SE, $0.49] billion), and angiotensin receptor blockers ($5.53 [SE, $0.35] billion).
Conclusions and relevance: Although therapeutic substitution is controversial, it offers a potential mechanism to significantly decrease drug costs if it can be implemented in a way that does not negatively affect quality of care.
Comment in
-
Therapeutic Substitution-Should It Be Systematic or Automatic?JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jun 1;176(6):776. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2271. JAMA Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27158769 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Potential savings from substituting generic drugs for brand-name drugs: medical expenditure panel survey, 1997-2000.Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 7;142(11):891-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-11-200506070-00006. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15941695
-
Association of Branded Prescription Drug Rebate Size and Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs in a Nationally Representative Sample, 2007-2018.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113393. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13393. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34125219 Free PMC article.
-
Medicare Part D Payments for Topical Steroids: Rising Costs and Potential Savings.JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Aug 1;153(8):755-759. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.1130. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28453645 Free PMC article.
-
Potential Clinical and Economic Impact of Switching Branded Medications to Generics.Am J Ther. 2017 May;24(3):e278-e289. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000282. Am J Ther. 2017. PMID: 26099048 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ongoing pharmaceutical reforms in France: implications for key stakeholder groups.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(1):7-24. doi: 10.1007/BF03256162. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010. PMID: 20038190 Review.
Cited by
-
Medication Reconciliation during Transitions of Care Across Institutions: A Quantitative Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities.Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):923-931. doi: 10.1055/a-2178-0197. Epub 2023 Sep 19. Appl Clin Inform. 2023. PMID: 37726022 Free PMC article.
-
Generic Substitutions and Therapeutic Interchanges in Hospital Pharmacies: A Qualitative Study from Western Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;11(13):1893. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131893. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37444727 Free PMC article.
-
Access to cardiovascular medicines in low- and middle-income countries: a mini review.Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 May 23;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00301-6. Glob Health Res Policy. 2023. PMID: 37221559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of the Affordable Care Act's Physician Payments Sunshine Act on branded statin prescribing.Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1145-1153. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14024. Epub 2022 Jul 18. Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35808991 Free PMC article.
-
"It's a mess sometimes": patient perspectives on provider responses to healthcare costs, and how informatics interventions can help support cost-sensitive care decisions.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 May 11;29(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac010. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35182148 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
