Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults
- PMID: 27160793
- DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2016.1157269
Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated outcomes and predictive factors, specifically language skills, for a group of prelingually hearing-impaired adults who received a cochlear implant.
Design: Speech perception data, demographic information, and other related variables such as communication mode, residual hearing, and receptive language abilities were explored. Pre- and post-implant speech perception scores were compared and multiple regression analysis was used to identify significant predictive relationships.
Study sample: The study included 43 adults with a prelingual onset of hearing loss, who proceeded with cochlear implantation at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
Results: The majority of patients experienced benefit from their cochlear implants, with 88% demonstrating significant improvement in speech perception performance. Volunteers achieved better post-operative speech perception scores if they had a shorter duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss, better language skills, and used an exclusively oral communication mode.
Conclusions: Although post-operative speech perception performance is significantly poorer for prelingually hearing-impaired adults compared to postlingually hearing-impaired patients, the study group demonstrated significant benefit from their cochlear implants. The variability in post-operative outcomes can be predicted to some extent from the hearing history and language abilities of the individual patient.
Keywords: Cochlear implants; outcomes; prelingual hearing loss; receptive language.
Similar articles
-
Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children: Audiological criteria and optimizing age at implantation.Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 2:S9-S18. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2016.1157268. Epub 2016 May 4. Int J Audiol. 2016. PMID: 27142630
-
The case for earlier cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf adults.Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 2:S51-6. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1128125. Epub 2016 Feb 26. Int J Audiol. 2016. PMID: 26918896
-
Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for postlingually deafened adults.Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 2:S3-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2016.1146415. Epub 2016 Mar 10. Int J Audiol. 2016. PMID: 26963131
-
Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):495-507. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000313. Ear Hear. 2016. PMID: 27232073 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Cochlear implant in children: rational, indications and cost/efficacy].Minerva Pediatr. 2013 Jun;65(3):325-39. Minerva Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23685383 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Long-Term Deafness.J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 31;11(17):5156. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175156. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36079089 Free PMC article.
-
Candidacy for Cochlear Implantation in Prelingual Profoundly Deaf Adult Patients.J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 28;11(7):1874. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071874. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35407482 Free PMC article.
-
Deficient Recurrent Cortical Processing in Congenital Deafness.Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Feb 25;16:806142. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.806142. eCollection 2022. Front Syst Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35283734 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-Analysis-Correlation between Spiral Ganglion Cell Counts and Speech Perception with a Cochlear Implant.Audiol Res. 2021 May 26;11(2):220-226. doi: 10.3390/audiolres11020020. Audiol Res. 2021. PMID: 34073290 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cochlear Implantation.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Oct 9;117(41):690-700. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0690. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020. PMID: 33357341 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
