Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Jul;19(4):310-5.
doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000288.

Sugar Replacers: From Technological Challenges to Consequences on Health

Affiliations
Review

Sugar Replacers: From Technological Challenges to Consequences on Health

Kim-Anne Lê et al. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Dietary sugars play a role in noncommunicable diseases and represent a clear target for reduction. In this context, product reformulation can have a positive impact on health. Several technological solutions are available to replace sugar, all with benefits and limitations. The goal of this review is to describe the main sugar replacement alternatives and discuss their impact on health and product physicochemical properties.

Recent findings: Although high intensity sweeteners and polyols have been used for a long time to replace sucrose and despite no clear evidence of harm, the trend is today to look for alternatives such as sweet enhancers or alternative sugars such as allulose or tagatose, which are both low caloric. To replace the physical properties of sugars, new trends are to substitute widely used maltodextrins by dietary fibres to confer added health benefits.

Summary: A wide range of solutions is currently available to replace dietary sugars and compensate for the impact on bulking properties and sweetness profile of food products.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback