Effects of Regulation and Payment Policies on Nurse Practitioners' Clinical Practices

Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Aug;74(4):431-451. doi: 10.1177/1077558716649109. Epub 2016 May 13.

Abstract

Increasing patient demand following health care reform has led to concerns about provider shortages, particularly in primary care and for Medicaid patients. Nurse practitioners (NPs) represent a potential solution to meeting demand. However, varying state scope of practice regulations and Medicaid reimbursement rates may limit efficient distribution of NPs. Using a national sample of 252,657 ambulatory practices, we examined the effect of state policies on NP employment in primary care and practice Medicaid acceptance. NPs had 13% higher odds of working in primary care in states with full scope of practice; those odds increased to 20% if the state also reimbursed NPs at 100% of the physician Medicaid fee-for-service rate. Furthermore, in states with 100% Medicaid reimbursement, practices with NPs had 23% higher odds of accepting Medicaid than practices without NPs. Removing scope of practice restrictions and increasing Medicaid reimbursement may increase NP participation in primary care and practice Medicaid acceptance.

Keywords: Medicaid; access to care; nurse practitioners; primary care; scope of practice.

MeSH terms

  • Government Regulation*
  • Health Care Reform / methods
  • Humans
  • Medicaid
  • Medicare
  • Nurse Practitioners* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Nurse Practitioners* / statistics & numerical data
  • Practice Patterns, Nurses'*
  • Primary Health Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Reimbursement Mechanisms / trends*
  • United States