Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 25 (4), 494-499

Global Sagittal Axis: A Step Toward Full-Body Assessment of Sagittal Plane Deformity in the Human Body


Global Sagittal Axis: A Step Toward Full-Body Assessment of Sagittal Plane Deformity in the Human Body

Bassel G Diebo et al. J Neurosurg Spine.


OBJECTIVE Sagittal malalignment requires higher energy expenditure to maintain an erect posture. Because the clinical impact of sagittal alignment is affected by both the severity of the deformity and recruitment of compensatory mechanisms, it is important to investigate new parameters that reflect both disability level and compensatory mechanisms for all patients. This study investigated the clinical relevance of the global sagittal axis (GSA), a novel measure to evaluate the standing axis of the human body. METHODS This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent full-body radiographs and completed health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society-22, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and the visual analog scale for back and leg pain. The GSA was defined as the angle formed by a line from the midpoint of the femoral condyles to the center of C-7, and a line from the midpoint between the femoral condyles to the posterior superior corner of the S-1 sacral endplate. After evaluating the correlation of GSA/HRQOL with sagittal parameters, linear regression models were generated to investigate how ODI and GSA related to radiographic parameters (T-1 pelvic angle, pelvic retroversion, knee flexion, and pelvic posterior translation). RESULTS One hundred forty-three patients (mean age 44 years) were included. The GSA correlated significantly with all HRQOL (up to r = 0.6 with EQ-5D) and radiographic parameters (up to r = 0.962 with sagittal vertical axis). Regression between ODI and sagittal radiographic parameters identified the GSA as an independent predictor (r = 0.517, r2 = 0.267; p < 0.001). Analysis of standardized coefficients revealed that when controlling for deformity, the GSA increased with a concurrent decrease in pelvic retroversion (-0.837) and increases in knee flexion (+0.287) and pelvic posterior translation (+0.193). CONCLUSIONS The GSA is a simple, novel measure to assess the standing axis of the human body in the sagittal plane. The GSA correlated highly with spinopelvic and lower-extremities sagittal parameters and exhibited remarkable correlations with HRQOL, which exceeded other commonly used parameters.

Keywords: CBVA = chin-brow vertical angle; EQ-5D = EuroQol-5D; GSA; GSA = global sagittal axis; HRQOL = health-related quality of life; KA = knee flexion angle; LL = lumbar lordosis; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PI = pelvic incidence; PT = pelvic tilt; SRS22r = Scoliosis Research Society–22, refined; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; TPA = T-1 pelvic angle; VAS = visual analog scale; deformity; full-body sagittal alignment; global sagittal axis.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 6 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles