Reduced-portion entrées in a worksite and restaurant setting: impact on food consumption and waste
- PMID: 27256403
- PMCID: PMC5080663
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980016001348
Reduced-portion entrées in a worksite and restaurant setting: impact on food consumption and waste
Abstract
Objective: Large portion sizes in restaurants have been identified as a public health risk. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether customers in two different food-service operator segments (non-commercial worksite cafeteria and commercial upscale restaurant) would select reduced-portion menu items and the impact of selecting reduced-portion menu items on energy and nutrient intakes and plate waste.
Design: Consumption and plate waste data were collected for 5 weeks before and 7 weeks after introduction of five reduced-size entrées in a worksite lunch cafeteria and for 3 weeks before and 4 weeks after introduction of five reduced-size dinner entrées in a restaurant setting. Full-size entrées were available throughout the entire study periods.
Setting: A worksite cafeteria and a commercial upscale restaurant in a large US Midwestern metropolitan area.
Subjects: Adult worksite employees and restaurant patrons.
Results: Reduced-size entrées accounted for 5·3-12·8 % and 18·8-31·3 % of total entrées selected in the worksite and restaurant settings, respectively. Food waste, energy intake and intakes of total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, Na, fibre, Ca, K and Fe were significantly lower when both full- and reduced-size entrées were served in the worksite setting and in the restaurant setting compared with when only full-size entrées were served.
Conclusions: A relatively small proportion of reduced-size entrées were selected but still resulted in reductions in overall energy and nutrient intakes. These outcomes could serve as the foundation for future studies to determine strategies to enhance acceptance of reduced-portion menu items in restaurant settings.
Keywords: Adults; Food service; Reduced-size entrées; Restaurant; Worksite cafeteria.
Similar articles
-
Energy, saturated fat, and sodium were lower in entrées at chain restaurants at 18 months compared with 6 months following the implementation of mandatory menu labeling regulation in King County, Washington.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Aug;112(8):1169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 Jun 15. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012. PMID: 22704898
-
Changes in the energy and sodium content of main entrées in US chain restaurants from 2010 to 2011.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Feb;114(2):209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.035. Epub 2013 Oct 1. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014. PMID: 24095622
-
The Fast-Casual Conundrum: Fast-Casual Restaurant Entrées Are Higher in Calories than Fast Food.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Oct;116(10):1606-1612. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 May 11. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016. PMID: 27179672
-
Fast-Food Offerings in the United States in 1986, 1991, and 2016 Show Large Increases in Food Variety, Portion Size, Dietary Energy, and Selected Micronutrients.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jun;119(6):923-933. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Feb 27. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019. PMID: 30826304
-
Dietary determinants of energy intake and weight regulation in healthy adults.J Nutr. 2000 Feb;130(2S Suppl):276S-279S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.2.276S. J Nutr. 2000. PMID: 10721887 Review.
Cited by 10 articles
-
Food Waste and Nutrition Quality in the Context of Public Health: A Scoping Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 18;18(10):5379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105379. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34070070 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Workplace cafeteria and other multicomponent interventions to promote healthy eating among adults: A systematic review.Prev Med Rep. 2021 Feb 23;22:101333. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101333. eCollection 2021 Jun. Prev Med Rep. 2021. PMID: 33732606 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Facilitating Healthier Eating at Restaurants: A Multidisciplinary Scoping Review Comparing Strategies, Barriers, Motivators, and Outcomes by Restaurant Type and Initiator.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 4;18(4):1479. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041479. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33557280 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Daily cost of consumer food wasted, inedible, and consumed in the United States, 2001-2016.Nutr J. 2020 Apr 20;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00552-w. Nutr J. 2020. PMID: 32306976 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Evaluation of the Eetmaatje Measuring Cup for Rice and Pasta as an Intervention to Reduce Food Waste.Front Nutr. 2020 Feb 18;6:197. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00197. eCollection 2019. Front Nutr. 2020. PMID: 32133367 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lin B & Guthrie J (2012) Nutritional Quality of Food Prepared at Home and Away From Home, 1977–2008. Economic Information Bulletin no. EIB-105. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
-
- US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (2013) Food CPI and Expenditure: Food Expenditure Tables, Table 10 – Food away from home as a share of food expenditure. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-expenditures.aspx (accessed May 2016).
-
- Wu HW & Sturm R (2013) What’s on the menu? A review of the energy and nutritional content of US chain restaurant menus. Public Health Nutr 16, 87–96. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
