Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Oct;9(4):567-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

Measurement characteristics for two health-related quality of life measures in older adults: The SF-36 and the CDC Healthy Days items

Affiliations

Measurement characteristics for two health-related quality of life measures in older adults: The SF-36 and the CDC Healthy Days items

John P Barile et al. Disabil Health J. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Healthy Days items are well known measures of health-related quality of life. The validity of the SF-36 for older adults and those with disabilities has been questioned.

Objective: Assess the extent to which the SF-36 and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Healthy Days items measure the same aspects of health; whether the SF-36 and the CDC unhealthy days items are invariant across gender, functional status, or the presence of chronic health conditions of older adults; and whether each of the SF-36's eight subscales is independently associated with the CDC Healthy Days items.

Methods: We analyzed data from 66,269 adult Medicare advantage members age 65 and older. We used confirmatory factor analyses and regression modeling to test associations between the CDC Healthy Days items and subscales of the SF-36.

Results: The CDC Healthy Days items were associated with the SF-36 global measures of physical and mental health. The CDC physically unhealthy days item was associated with the SF-36 subscales for bodily pain, physical role limitations, and general health, while the CDC mentally unhealthy days item was associated with the SF-36 subscales for mental health, emotional role limitations, vitality and social functioning. The SF-36 physical functioning subscale was not independently associated with either of the CDC Healthy Days items.

Conclusions: The CDC Healthy Days items measure similar domains as the SF-36 but appear to assess HRQOL without regard to limitations in functioning.

Keywords: Functional limitations; Health-related quality of life; Healthy Days; Measurement; SF-36.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This study did not receive any financial support. The authors do not report any conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health-related Quality of Life and Well-being. Healthy People 2020-Improving the Health of Americans. 2014 http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?top....
    1. Barile JP, Reeve BB, Smith AW, et al. Monitoring population health for healthy people 2020: evaluation of the NIH PROMIS® global health, CDC Healthy Days, and satisfaction with life instruments. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1201–1211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newschaffer CJ. Validation of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) HRQOL Measures in a Statewide Sample. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1998.
    1. Ware JE, Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B, et al. The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1159–1165. - PubMed
    1. De Vet HC, Adèr HJ, Terwee CB, Pouwer F. Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1203–1218. - PubMed

Publication types