Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 28;113(26):7243-8.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606537113. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

Transmembrane channel-like (tmc) gene regulates Drosophila larval locomotion

Affiliations

Transmembrane channel-like (tmc) gene regulates Drosophila larval locomotion

Yanmeng Guo et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Drosophila larval locomotion, which entails rhythmic body contractions, is controlled by sensory feedback from proprioceptors. The molecular mechanisms mediating this feedback are little understood. By using genetic knock-in and immunostaining, we found that the Drosophila melanogaster transmembrane channel-like (tmc) gene is expressed in the larval class I and class II dendritic arborization (da) neurons and bipolar dendrite (bd) neurons, both of which are known to provide sensory feedback for larval locomotion. Larvae with knockdown or loss of tmc function displayed reduced crawling speeds, increased head cast frequencies, and enhanced backward locomotion. Expressing Drosophila TMC or mammalian TMC1 and/or TMC2 in the tmc-positive neurons rescued these mutant phenotypes. Bending of the larval body activated the tmc-positive neurons, and in tmc mutants this bending response was impaired. This implicates TMC's roles in Drosophila proprioception and the sensory control of larval locomotion. It also provides evidence for a functional conservation between Drosophila and mammalian TMCs.

Keywords: locomotion; mechanosensation; proprioception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. S1.
Fig. S1.
Protein sequence alignment between representative members of the TMC family, including human TMC2 (NP_542789), mouse TMC1 (NP_083229), Xenopus TMC1 (predicted, XP_002935639.1), zebrafish TMC1 (AIK19895.1), C. elegans TMC1 (NP_508221), and Drosophila TMC (AFH04369). Blue bars above the sequences indicate predicted transmembrane segments. Green shading indicates the predicted TMC domains. Transmembrane and TMC domains are largely conserved. Drosophila TMC is much longer than that in other TMC family members.
Fig. S1.
Fig. S1.
Protein sequence alignment between representative members of the TMC family, including human TMC2 (NP_542789), mouse TMC1 (NP_083229), Xenopus TMC1 (predicted, XP_002935639.1), zebrafish TMC1 (AIK19895.1), C. elegans TMC1 (NP_508221), and Drosophila TMC (AFH04369). Blue bars above the sequences indicate predicted transmembrane segments. Green shading indicates the predicted TMC domains. Transmembrane and TMC domains are largely conserved. Drosophila TMC is much longer than that in other TMC family members.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Generation of tmc reporter and mutant alleles. (A) Targeting schemes for the generation of the tmcGal4 mutant allele by homologous recombination and the generation of the tmc-Gal4 transgene. Black bars under CG46121-PD indicate the predicted transmembrane segments of Drosophila TMC (33). Red Bars above CG46121-PD indicate the predicted TMC domain (32). (B) Confirmation of the tmcGal4 mutation as a null allele for transcript expression by RT-PCR.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Expression pattern of tmc. (A) Labeling via tmc-Gal4 and endogenous expression of Drosophila TMC in class I and class II da neurons and bd neurons. (B) Labeling via tmcGal4 revealing the loss of expression of Drosophila TMC in class I and class II da neurons and bd neurons. (C) Restoration of Drosophila TMC expression in class I and class II da neurons and bd neurons by expressing Drosophila TMC. Arrowheads: bd neuron. Triangle: class I da neuron. Arrows: class II da neuron. Green indicates GFP signals, and red indicates TMC immunofluorescent signals. (A, Left) “D” indicates dorsal, and “P” indicates posterior. (Scale bar, 50 μm.)
Fig. S2.
Fig. S2.
tmc-Gal4 expression in larvae and adult. tmc-Gal4 labels class I and class II da neurons and bd neurons. Arrowhead: bd neuron. Triangle: class I da neuron. Arrow: class II da neurons. There was no detectable expression of tmc-Gal4 in the larval CNS. In the adult fly, tmc-Gal4 labels sensory neurons in the mouth, wing, haltere, arista, the third segment of the antenna, and the Johnston organ.
Fig. S3.
Fig. S3.
Validation of the TMC antibody. (A) Immunostaining of Drosophila TMC ectopically expressed in the fly brain. Drosophila TMC was expressed in excitatory cholinergic neurons via Cha-Gal4. Fly genotype: Cha-Gal4, UAS-GFP; UAS-tmc. (Inset) Zoom-in of the cell-body region documenting enrichment of TMC around the cell membrane. (B) Immunostaining of TMC ectopically expressed in Drosophila S2R+ cells. Cells were transfected with TMC (Lower) or without TMC (Upper).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
tmc is important for Drosophila larval locomotion. (A) Crawling trajectories of wild-type w1118 larvae, tmcGal4 mutants, UAS-tmc controls, and UAS-tmc; tmcGal4 larvae. (Scale bar, 1 cm.) Restoring tmc expression rescued the locomotion defects in locomotion speed (B), head curl duration in 90 s (C), and backward wave numbers (D) in 90 s. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test was used to test for the statistical significance of the differences between wild-type w1118, tmcGal4, UAS-tmc, and rescue (UAS-tmc; tmcGal4) larvae. ***P < 0.001. (E) Head curl duration (in 90 s) and (F) backward wave numbers (in 90 s) are comparable between tmcGal4 and Df(3L)BSC576/tmcGal4 larvae, with significant increase compared with wild-type control. One-way ANOVA was used to test for the statistical significance of the differences between tmcGal4, UAS-tmc, and rescue (UAS-tmc; tmcGal4) larvae, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. ***P < 0.001. NS, not significant. (G) Head curl duration in 90 s and (H) backward wave numbers in 90 s of tmc-Gal4, UAS-tmc-RNAi, and tmc knockdown (UAS-tmc-RNAi; tmc-Gal4) larvae. One-way ANOVA was used to test for the statistical significance of the differences between tmc-Gal4, UAS-tmc-RNAi, and tmc knockdown (UAS-tmc-RNAi; tmc-Gal4) larvae, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. *P < 0.05. NS, not significant. n > 10.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Mechanosensitive calcium responses in the axon terminals of TMC-expressing neurons. (A) Experimental setup for imaging bending-evoked calcium signals in the axon terminals of TMC-expressing neurons. Bending was evoked using a glass probe. (B) Abdominal bending-evoked calcium signals in wild-type larvae and tmc mutant larvae. There is a GCaMP signal background difference between tmc-Gal4 and tmcGal4 due to the different expression levels between them. (C) Statistical analysis of the calcium responses in wild-type and tmc mutant larvae. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test was used to test the difference between wild-type w1118 and tmcGal4. ***P < 0.001. n ≥ 9.
Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Dendrite morphology of class I da neurons and axon projection of tmc-positive neurons in ventral nerve cord. Neither (A) dendrite morphology of class I da neurons nor (B) axon projection of tmc-positive neurons in ventral nerve cord shows obvious defects in tmc mutant or tmc rescue flies.
Fig. S5.
Fig. S5.
Example traces of electrophysiological recordings from cultured S2 cells transfected with NOMPC or Drosophila TMC, documenting responses to mechanical stimuli in the former but not the latter.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Mammalian TMC1 and TMC2 rescue locomotion defects in tmc mutants. (A) Head curl duration (in 90 s) and (B) backward wave numbers (in 90 s) of wild-type, UAS-mtmc2; tmcGal4, UAS-mtmc1/UAS-mtmc2; tmcGal4, and UAS-mtmc1; tmcGal4 larvae are significantly less than those of tmcGal4 larvae. One-way ANOVA was used to test for the statistical significance of the differences, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. ***P < 0.001. NS, not significant. n ≥ 8.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hasan Z. Role of proprioceptors in neural control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1992;2(6):824–829. - PubMed
    1. Dietz V. Proprioception and locomotor disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(10):781–790. - PubMed
    1. Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(4):1651–1697. - PubMed
    1. Kernan MJ. Mechanotransduction and auditory transduction in Drosophila. Pflugers Arch. 2007;454(5):703–720. - PubMed
    1. Caldwell JC, Miller MM, Wing S, Soll DR, Eberl DF. Dynamic analysis of larval locomotion in Drosophila chordotonal organ mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(26):16053–16058. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types