Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;21(6):1172-1182.
doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-1003-z. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

Current Situation Regarding Central Venous Port Implantation Procedures and Complications: A Questionnaire-Based Survey of 11,693 Implantations in Japan

Affiliations

Current Situation Regarding Central Venous Port Implantation Procedures and Complications: A Questionnaire-Based Survey of 11,693 Implantations in Japan

Masatoshi Shiono et al. Int J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: We conducted a nationwide questionnaire-based survey to understand the current situation regarding central venous port implantation in order to identify the ideal procedure.

Methods: Questionnaire sheets concerning the number of implantation procedures and the incidence of complications for all procedures completed in 2012 were sent to 397 nationwide designated cancer care hospitals in Japan in June 2013. Venipuncture sites were categorized as chest, neck, upper arm, forearm, and others. Methods were categorized as landmark, cut-down, ultrasound-mark, real-time ultrasound guided, venography, and other groups.

Results: We received 374 responses (11,693 procedures) from 153 centers (38.5 %). The overall complication rates were 7.4 % for the chest (598/8,097 cases); 6.8 % for the neck (157/2325); 5.2 % for the upper arm (54/1,033); 7.3 % for the forearm (9/124); and 6.1 % for the other groups (7/114). Compared to the chest group, only the upper arm group showed a significantly lower incidence of complications (P = 0.010), and multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio 0.69; 95 % confidence interval 0.51-0.91; P = 0.008) also showed similar findings. Real-time ultrasound-guided puncture was most commonly used in the upper arm group (83.8 %), followed by the neck (69.8 %), forearm (53.2 %), chest (41.8 %), and other groups (34.2 %).

Conclusion: Upper arm venipuncture with ultrasound guidance seems the most promising technique to prevent complications of central venous port implantation.

Keywords: Central venous port; Chemotherapy; Supportive therapy.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Cancer. 2007 Nov 15;110(10):2331-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;24(1):44-7 - PubMed
    1. Ann Oncol. 1998 Jul;9(7):767-73 - PubMed
    1. Br J Radiol. 2012 Nov;85(1019):e966-72 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3725-31 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback