Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. Nov-Dec 2016;20(6):561-570.
doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0166. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

New Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-CAT): Translation, Cultural Adaptation to Brazil and Analyses of Psychometric Properties

Affiliations
Free PMC article

New Version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-CAT): Translation, Cultural Adaptation to Brazil and Analyses of Psychometric Properties

Marisa C Mancini et al. Braz J Phys Ther. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT), developed with innovative measurement methodologies, evaluates functioning of children and youth, from 0 to 21 years, with different health conditions. It is a revision of an earlier instrument (PEDI) that has been used in national and international clinical practice and research. It was felt to be necessary to make this new version (PEDI-CAT) available in Brazil.

Objectives: Translate and culturally adapt the PEDI-CAT to the Brazilian-Portuguese language and test its psychometric properties.

Method: This methodological study was developed through the following stages: (1) translation, (2) synthesis, (3) back-translation, (4) revision by an expert committee, (5) testing of the pre-final version, and (6) evaluation of the psychometric properties. The 276 translated PEDI-CAT items were divided into three age groups (0-7, 8-14, and 15-21 years).

Results: The PEDI-CAT translation followed all six stages. The adaptations incorporated cultural and socioeconomic class specificities. The PEDI-CAT/Brazil showed good indices of inter-examiner (intraclass correlation coefficient-ICC=0.83-0.89) and test-retest (ICC=0.96-0.97) reliability, good internal consistency (0.99) and small standard error of measurement in all three age groups (0.12-0.17). Factor analyses grouped the items from the three functional skills domains into one factor, and items from the responsibility scale into three factors, supporting the adequacy of these factor solutions to the conceptual structure of the instrument and the developmental model.

Conclusion: The PEDI-CAT/Brazil is a theoretically consistent, culturally appropriate, and reliable instrument. Its availability in Brazil will contribute to the evaluation and measurement of functional outcomes from clinical interventions, longitudinal follow-up, and rehabilitation research.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Pilz B, Vasconcelos RA, Marcondes FB, Lodovichi SS, Mello W, Grossi DB. The Brazilian version of STarT Back Screening Tool - translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(5):453–461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lamarão AM, Costa LCM, Comper MLC, Padula RS. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation to Brazilian-Portuguese and reliability analysis of the instrument Rapid Entire Body Assessment-REBA. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(3):211–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0035 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Furtado SRC, Sampaio RF, Vaz DV, Pinho BAS, Nascimento IO, Mancini MC. Brazilian version of the instrument of environmental assessment Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF): translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(3):259–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0036 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lopes AR, Trelha CS. Translation, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ): FRAQ-Brazil. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(6):593–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000128 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pereira LM, Dias JM, Mazuquin BF, Castanhas LG, Menacho MO, Cardoso JR. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and analysis of the psychometric properties of the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): LEFS- BRAZIL. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(3):272–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000091 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback