Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 19 (1), 83-89

Comprehensive Genetic Analysis of Pregnancy Loss by Chromosomal Microarrays: Outcomes, Benefits, and Challenges


Comprehensive Genetic Analysis of Pregnancy Loss by Chromosomal Microarrays: Outcomes, Benefits, and Challenges

Trilochan Sahoo et al. Genet Med.


Purpose: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is currently considered first-tier testing in pediatric care and prenatal diagnosis owing to its high diagnostic sensitivity for chromosomal imbalances. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and diagnostic power of CMA in both fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of products of conception (POCs).

Methods: Over a 44-month period, 8,118 consecutive samples were received by our laboratory for CMA analysis. This included both fresh (76.4%) and FFPE samples (22.4%), most of which were ascertained for recurrent pregnancy loss and/or spontaneous abortion (83%). The majority of samples were evaluated by a whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based array (81.6%); the remaining samples were evaluated by array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).

Results: A successful result was obtained in 7,396 of 8,118 (91.1%), with 92.4% of fresh tissue samples and 86.4% of FFPE samples successfully analyzed. Clinically significant abnormalities were identified in 53.7% of specimens (3,975 of 7,396), 94% of which were considered causative.

Conclusion: Analysis of POC specimens by karyotyping fails in 20-40% of cases. SNP-based CMA is a robust platform, with successful results obtained in >90% of cases. SNP-based CMA can identify aneuploidy, polyploidy, whole-genome homozygosity, segmental genomic imbalances, and maternal cell contamination, thus maximizing sensitivity and decreasing false-negative results. Understanding the etiology of fetal loss enables clarification of recurrence risk and assists in determining appropriate management for future family planning.Genet Med 19 1, 83-89.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 12 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 May;66(5):1516-21 - PubMed
    1. Fertil Steril. 2001 Apr;75(4):678-82 - PubMed
    1. Genet Med. 2005 Apr;7(4):251-63 - PubMed
    1. Mol Cytogenet. 2012 Jul 16;5(1):33 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001 Jul;9(7):539-47 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources