Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun 24:6:28528.
doi: 10.1038/srep28528.

Allosteric modulation of AURKA kinase activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of its protein-protein interaction with TPX2

Affiliations

Allosteric modulation of AURKA kinase activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of its protein-protein interaction with TPX2

Matej Janeček et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The essential mitotic kinase Aurora A (AURKA) is controlled during cell cycle progression via two distinct mechanisms. Following activation loop autophosphorylation early in mitosis when it localizes to centrosomes, AURKA is allosterically activated on the mitotic spindle via binding to the microtubule-associated protein, TPX2. Here, we report the discovery of AurkinA, a novel chemical inhibitor of the AURKA-TPX2 interaction, which acts via an unexpected structural mechanism to inhibit AURKA activity and mitotic localization. In crystal structures, AurkinA binds to a hydrophobic pocket (the 'Y pocket') that normally accommodates a conserved Tyr-Ser-Tyr motif from TPX2, blocking the AURKA-TPX2 interaction. AurkinA binding to the Y- pocket induces structural changes in AURKA that inhibit catalytic activity in vitro and in cells, without affecting ATP binding to the active site, defining a novel mechanism of allosteric inhibition. Consistent with this mechanism, cells exposed to AurkinA mislocalise AURKA from mitotic spindle microtubules. Thus, our findings provide fresh insight into the catalytic mechanism of AURKA, and identify a key structural feature as the target for a new class of dual-mode AURKA inhibitors, with implications for the chemical biology and selective therapeutic targeting of structurally related kinases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Identification of AurkinA, inhibitor of Aurora A-TPX2 complex.
(a) The binding of AURKA123–403 to TAMRA-TPX21–43 in fluorescence anisotropy assay. Kd = 83 nM (pKd = 7.07 ± 0.07). (b) Displacement of TAMRA-TPX21–43 by inhibitors in fluorescence anisotropy assay. (c) Synthetic strategy: deconstruction and optimisation of compound 1 identified from the HTS screen. Ki value was derived from FA competition assay using free-concentration corrected Cheng-Prusov equations. Kd values were obtained using isothermal titration calorimetry. Ligand efficiency (Leff) was calculated using Ki or Kd values. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 2
Figure 2. AurkinA triggers conformational changes in AURKA protein.
(a) Crystal structure of AURKA126–390 liganded with Mg2+ -ATP and AurkinA (5DT4,gray), overlayed with TPX21–43 (1OL5, orange). AurkinA (blue) is bound to the pocket defined by αC and αB helices, a binding site of the YSY motif of TPX2. The hydrophobic Y-pocket sits above the ATP-site. (b) The detail of AurkinA (blue) and TPX28–11 (orange) binding in the Y-pocket. (c) Binding pose of AurkinA in the Y-pocket. Carboxylic acid of AurkinA interacts with amine of K166, which is stabilised by H201. 2Fo-Fc map (blue) is countered at 1σ, anomalous map (pink) is contoured at 5σ. (d) The conformational change of Mg2+ -ATP liganded structure (5DT3, orange) upon AurkinA binding (5DT4, gray). The binding induces an anticlockwise rotation of αC helix by interacting with R179 and the hydrophobic floor. The shift of αB helix causes changes of hydrogen bonding pattern in glycine-rich loop, breaking of Q168-K143 hydrogen bond and movement of F144. (e) The overlay of AurkinA (magenta, 5DPV) and its analogues AA29 (green, 5DR9) and AA30 (cyan, 5DR6) bound to the Y-pocket. The related compounds bind with a consistent binding mode and the conformations of the amino acids lining the pocket are very similart between the liganded crystal structures. (f) The structures of the Y-pocket binders: AA29, AA30 and AurkinA; and JNJ-7706621, a potent ATP-competitive AURKA inhibitor.
Figure 3
Figure 3. AurkinA causes allosteric inihibition of the kinase activity of AURKA.
(a) AurkinA inhibits the kinase activity of pT287/pT288 AURKA126–390 in homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence assay (HTRF, KinEASY, Cisbio) in absence of TPX2. The volume of enzymatic reaction was 10 μL, [AURKA] = 5 ng/well, excess propriatory peptide substrate (1 μM) and ATP (100 μM). The reaction was incubated for 10 min. MLN8237 is an ATP-competitive inhibitor used as a positive control. AurkinA excess did not cause a complete ablation of AURKA kinase activity. (b) In presence of AurkinA, the maximum rate of AURKA kinase activity (Vmax) decreased, but Km for ATP remained unchanged. Such a kinetic profile is consistent with a non-ATP competitive inhibition, suggesting that AurkinA inhibited the kinase activity of AURKA allosterically. (c) AurkinA slowed down the in vitro autophosphorylation of AURKAGSMGS-126-390 with uncleaved His-tag (30 μM), as detected by anti-pT288 antibody. [ATP] = 100 μM, J* = JNJ-7706621. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 4
Figure 4. AurkinA mislocalises AURKA from the bipolar spindle in mitotic cells.
(a) Representative immunofluorescence images of HeLa cells expressing mCherry-TPX21–43 fusion protein under doxycycline (DOX) control. mCherry-TPX21–43 fusion overexpression as well as AurkinA mislocalise of AURKA from the spindle. (b) Quantitative analysis of AURKA mislocalisation from the spindle, as defined by % cells with below threshold AURKA intensity under TPX2 mask. AurkinA mislocalises AURKA from the spindle in a dose dependent manner with EC50 = 85 μM. (c) AurkinA deactivates AURKA, as measured by increase of % of cells with below threshold phosohorylated T288 (pT288). EC50 = 135 μM. The error bars represent standard deviation (n = 5).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scott D. E. et al.. Using a fragment-based approach to target protein-protein interactions. ChemBioChem 14, 332–342 (2013). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldenson B. & Crispino J. D. The aurora kinases in cell cycle and leukemia. Oncogene 34, 537–545 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geschwindner S., Ulander J. & Johansson P. Ligand binding thermodynamics in drug discovery: still a hot tip? J. Med. Chem. 58, 6321–6335 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Chan C. S. & Botstein D. Isolation and characterization of chromosome-gain and increase-in-ploidy mutants in yeast. Genetics 135, 677–691 (1993). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glover D. M., Leibowitz M. H., McLean D. A. & Parry H. Mutations in aurora prevent centrosome separation leading to the formation of monopolar spindles. Cell 81, 95–105 (1995). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms