Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Filters applied. Clear all
Multicenter Study
. 2016 Oct 1;173(10):980-988.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15070890. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

An Individualized Risk Calculator for Research in Prodromal Psychosis

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Multicenter Study

An Individualized Risk Calculator for Research in Prodromal Psychosis

Tyrone D Cannon et al. Am J Psychiatry. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: Approximately 20%-35% of individuals 12-35 years old who meet criteria for a prodromal risk syndrome convert to psychosis within 2 years. However, this estimate ignores the fact that clinical high-risk cases vary considerably in risk. The authors sought to create a risk calculator, based on profiles of risk indicators, that can ascertain the probability of conversion to psychosis in individual patients.

Method: The study subjects were 596 clinical high-risk participants from the second phase of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study who were followed up to the time of conversion to psychosis or last contact (up to 2 years). The predictors examined were limited to those that are supported by previous studies and are readily obtainable in general clinical settings. Time-to-event regression was used to build a multivariate model predicting conversion, with internal validation using 1,000 bootstrap resamples.

Results: The 2-year probability of conversion to psychosis was 16%. Higher levels of unusual thought content and suspiciousness, greater decline in social functioning, lower verbal learning and memory performance, slower speed of processing, and younger age at baseline each contributed to individual risk for psychosis. Stressful life events, trauma, and family history of schizophrenia were not significant predictors. The multivariate model achieved a concordance index of 0.71 and, as reported in an article by Carrión et al., published concurrently with this one, was validated in an independent external data set. The results are instantiated in a web-based risk prediction tool envisioned to be most useful in research protocols involving the psychosis prodrome.

Conclusions: A risk calculator comparable in accuracy to those for cardiovascular disease and cancer is available to predict individualized conversion risks in newly ascertained clinical high-risk cases. Given that the risk calculator can be validly applied only for patients who screen positive on the Structured Clinical Interview for Psychosis Risk Syndromes, which requires training to administer, its most immediate uses will be in research on psychosis risk factors and in research-driven clinical (prevention) trials.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflicts of interest. Dr. Cannon reports that he is a consultant to the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Mathalon reports that he is a consultant to Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency distributions of predicted risks in the sample overall (blue) and among converters separately (red). Beginning at a predicted risk of .20 or higher, converters are occur at a higher rate than the sample base rate in each successive risk class.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calibration plot of the accuracy of model-predicted probability in relation to observed probability of psychosis. The observed probability was estimated using proportional hazard regression evaluating the predicted 2-year probabilities in relation to the observed conversion events, taking into account time to conversion or censoring. The over-fitting bias for the estimated observed probability was corrected using 1000 bootstrap resamples. The plot shows excellent calibration across predicted probabilities of 0.0 – 0.4, corresponding to 95% of the NAPLS 2 sample. Predicted probabilities above 0.4 are too sparsely represented to permit adequate calibration testing.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 94 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback