Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 4;49(7):e5257.
doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20165257.

Effect of magnesium ion on human osteoblast activity

Affiliations

Effect of magnesium ion on human osteoblast activity

L Y He et al. Braz J Med Biol Res. .

Abstract

Magnesium, a promising biodegradable metal, has been reported in several studies to increase bone formation. Although there is some information regarding the concentrations of magnesium ions that affect bone remodeling at a cellular level, little is known about the effect of magnesium ions on cell gap junctions. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically investigate the effects of different concentrations of magnesium on bone cells, and further evaluate its effect on gap junctions of osteoblasts. Cultures of normal human osteoblasts were treated with magnesium ions at concentrations of 1, 2 and 3 mM, for 24, 48 and 72 h. The effects of magnesium ions on viability and function of normal human osteoblasts and on gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) in osteoblasts were investigated. Magnesium ions induced significant (P<0.05) increases in cell viability, alkaline phosphate activity and osteocalcin levels of human osteoblasts. These stimulatory actions were positively associated with the concentration of magnesium and the time of exposure. Furthermore, the GJIC of osteoblasts was significantly promoted by magnesium ions. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that magnesium ions induced the activity of osteoblasts by enhancing GJIC between cells, and influenced bone formation. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of the influence of magnesium on bone remodeling and to the advance of its application in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Average absorbance of osteoblasts treated with magnesium (Mg2+). The absorbance of cells increased with the increasing concentration of Mg2+ and with longer exposure time. @,+,&P<0.05, differences over time at concentrations of 1, 2 and 3 mM, respectively. #P<0.05, differences among various concentrations of magnesium at each time point; *P<0.05, differences from the control group at each time point (ANOVA).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Average alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity for osteoblastic cells treated with magnesium (Mg2+). The level of ALP activity for osteoblasts was stimulated by (Mg2+), and was positively associated with the concentration of Mg2+ and the time of exposure. @,+,&P<0.05, differences over time at concentrations of 1, 2 and 3 mM, respectively. #P<0.05, differences among various concentrations of Mg2+ at each time point. *P<0.05, differences from the control group at each time point (ANOVA).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Average osteocalcin levels in osteoblasts treated with magnesium (Mg2+). The stimulation action of Mg2+ was positively associated with concentrations of Mg2+ and time of exposure. @,+,&P<0.05, for differences over time at concentrations of 1, 2 and 3 mM, respectively. #P<0.05, for differences among various concentrations of Mg2+ at each time point. *P<0.05, for differences from the control group at each time point (ANOVA).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Average fluorescence recovery (R value) for osteoblasts treated with magnesium (Mg2+). The stimulation action was positively associated with the concentration of Mg2+ and the time of exposure. @,+,&P<0.05, for differences over time at concentrations of 1, 2 and 3 mM, respectively. #P<0.05, for differences among various concentrations of Mg2+ at each time point. *P<0.05, for differences from the control group at each time point (ANOVA).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cho LR, Kim DG, Kim JH, Byon ES, Jeong YS, Park CJ. Bone response of Mg ion-implanted clinical implants with the plasma source ion implantation method. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:848–856. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01862.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li Z, Gu X, Lou S, Zheng Y. The development of binary Mg-Ca alloys for use as biodegradable materials within bone. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1329–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Witte F, Hort N, Vogt C, Cohen S, Kainer KU, Willumeit R, et al. Degradable biomaterials based on magnesium corrosion. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2008;12:63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2009.04.001. - DOI
    1. Hong D, Saha P, Chou DT, Lee B, Collins BE, Tan Z, et al. In vitro degradation and cytotoxicity response of Mg-4% Zn-0.5% Zr (ZK40) alloy as a potential biodegradable material. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:8534–8547. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weng L, Webster TJ. Nanostructured magnesium has fewer detrimental effects on osteoblast function. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:1773–1781. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S39031. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types