Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;12(9):709-16.
doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2126. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

Conformationally selective RNA aptamers allosterically modulate the β2-adrenoceptor

Affiliations

Conformationally selective RNA aptamers allosterically modulate the β2-adrenoceptor

Alem W Kahsai et al. Nat Chem Biol. 2016 Sep.

Abstract

G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands function by stabilizing multiple, functionally distinct receptor conformations. This property underlies the ability of 'biased agonists' to activate specific subsets of a given receptor's signaling profile. However, stabilizing distinct active GPCR conformations to enable structural characterization of mechanisms underlying GPCR activation remains difficult. These challenges have accentuated the need for receptor tools that allosterically stabilize and regulate receptor function through unique, previously unappreciated mechanisms. Here, using a highly diverse RNA library combined with advanced selection strategies involving state-of-the-art next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics analyses, we identify RNA aptamers that bind a prototypical GPCR, the β2-adrenoceptor (β2AR). Using biochemical, pharmacological, and biophysical approaches, we demonstrate that these aptamers bind with nanomolar affinity at defined surfaces of the receptor, allosterically stabilizing active, inactive, and ligand-specific receptor conformations. The discovery of RNA aptamers as allosteric GPCR modulators significantly expands the diversity of ligands available to study the structural and functional regulation of GPCRs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Generation of conformation-specific RNA aptamers against the β2AR
(a) Schematic overview of the selection strategy, NGS, bioinformatics analysis, and characterization of candidate aptamers. Ribbon diagram representation for selection against inactive β2AR (colored in blue; PDB: 2RH1) or active β2AR bound to high affinity agonist BI167107 (colored in red; PDB: 3SN6). MNG detergent micelles are represented in gray. Encircled orange areas show potential binding regions for aptamers to different β2AR conformations. (b) Scatter plot from NGS analysis, comparing fold enrichment-ratios (R4 to R9) for the top 20-aptamer sequences from selection on unliganded β2AR (x-axis) versus BI167107-bound β2AR (y-axis). Each point in the plot represents a unique aptamer (the top seven candidate binders are color-coded in red, blue, or purple) according to their enrichment and selectivity to a selection target. (c) Bar graph shows top seven aptamers and their capacity to bind unliganded β2AR or BI167107-bound β2AR as assessed by pull-down assay. Boxed bars denote the four aptamers, selected for further characterization. Data shown represent the mean ± s.e.m. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001) of three independent experiments, analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Fisher’s LSD post-test.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Aptamers distinguish between inactive and active conformations of the β2AR
Binding kinetic profiles for the interactions of four biotinylated aptamers with BI167107-bound (active) β2AR or ICI-118,551-bound (inactive) β2AR as analyzed using biolayer interferometry (BLI). (a–d) Representative sensorgrams for the interactions of four biotinylated aptamers with BI167107-bound β2AR (left panels) or ICI-118,551-bound β2AR (right panels): A1 (a), A2 (b), A13 (c), and A16 (d). Data was globally fit to 1:1 binding model as described in methods. Kd (dissociation constant) is shown as the ratio of koff (dissociation) to kon (association) rate constants. Each Kd value represents the mean affinity values ± s.e.m. of three independent experiments. Blue, gray, green, and light blue curves represent the measured responses for each tested concentration of β2AR (BI167107 or ICI-118,551-bound β2AR). Whereas overlay the curves in red show the global fitting results of the binding data.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Selectivity of aptamers for specific β2AR conformations correlates with receptor ligand efficacy or ligand specificity
(a) Dose-response curves for the competition of the radioiodinated antagonist cyanopindolol ([125I]-CYP) binding with isoproterenol in β2AR reconstituted within HDL particles in the presence or absence of aptamers (A1, A2, A13, A16 or CNT-Apt). The ordinates represent the specific binding of 60 pmol/L [125I]-CYP in the presence of different concentrations of ISO. Curves were obtained from three independent experiments. Error bars represent standard errors. (b–e) Western blotting analyses from binding experiments using specified biotinylated aptamers (A1, A2, A13 or A16) interacting with β2AR in the absence or presence of various ligands. Agonists are shown (bars, royal blue) and antagonists (bars, cyan). Structures and functional properties of the nine β-adrenoceptor ligands are shown in Supplementary Figure 6. Binding of four aptamers to various forms of β2AR: A1 (b) and A13 (d) preference for agonist-bound β2AR; A2 (c) preference for ligand-specific form of β2AR; and A16 (e) preference for antagonist-bound β2AR. Aptamer input is indicated by ethidium bromide staining of the eluted RNA. Data correspond to the mean ± standard error of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Influence of aptamers on conformational changes conferred by ligands
(a–d) Bimane fluorescence quenching measurement shows that aptamers A1, A2, and A13 stabilize active forms of β2AR, while aptamer A16 stabilizes an inactive conformation. Bimane fluorescence quenching measurement detects conformational changes of the β2AR via movement of a bimane probe on TM6 (at C265) upon the binding of agonists, (BI167107 [BI] or isoproterenol [ISO]) and/or aptamer: A1 (a), A2 (b), A13 (c) or A16 (d). Fluorescence emission spectra showing ligand-induced conformational changes of bimane-labeled β2AR in the absence (black dashed line) or presence of full agonist (ISO, blue dashed line, or BI, red dashed line), inverse agonist ICI-118,551 (ICI, green dashed line), aptamer A1, A2, A13, or A16 (black solid line), or a combination of aptamer (A1, A2, A13, or A16) with ISO (blue solid line), BI (red solid line), or ICI (green solid line).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Functional effect of aptamers on β2AR–mediated Gαs and AC activation
β2AR-dependent stimulation of AC activity and accumulation of cAMP was measured in HEK-293 membrane homogenates stably expressing β2AR (expression level: ~2.5 pmoles/mg) in the presence of 100 nM of isoproterenol (ISO) or combination of 100 nM ISO with aptamer (A1, A2, A13, A16 or control aptamer). Data represents the means ± s.e.m. of at least four independent experiments. Asterisks in the bar graphs denote significant differences (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01) by one-way ANOVA (with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) from results for AC activity performed with control aptamer.
Figure 6
Figure 6. EM analysis and molecular architecture of β2AR–aptamer complexes
(a–d) EM characterization of purified β2AR-aptamer-Fab complexes. Shown on the left side of each panel are two-dimensional (2D) particle class average particles of the β2AR–aptamer-Fab complexes. Scale bar is 10 nm. The left side of each panel shows 2D particle averages of anti-FLAG Fab labeled β2AR in complex with aptamer A1 (a), A2 (b), A13 (c) or A16 (d). The right side of each panel shows a cartoon representation of the class average; the various components in the 2D–image maps (β2AR in red; detergent micelle labeled with “m” in light-gray; anti-FLAG Fab antibody in dark-red; the aptamers in lime-green [A1], medium-purple [A2], pink [A13] and gray [A16]).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pierce KL, Premont RT, Lefkowitz RJ. Seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:639–650. - PubMed
    1. Lefkowitz RJ. A brief history of G-protein coupled receptors (Nobel Lecture) Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52:6366–6378. - PubMed
    1. Lagerstrom MC, Schioth HB. Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:339–357. - PubMed
    1. Kobilka BK. Amino and carboxyl terminal modifications to facilitate the production and purification of a G protein-coupled receptor. Anal Biochem. 1995;231:269–271. - PubMed
    1. Rajagopal S, Rajagopal K, Lefkowitz RJ. Teaching old receptors new tricks: biasing seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:373–386. - PMC - PubMed

REFERENCES (ONLINE METHODS only)

    1. Denisov IG, Grinkova YV, Lazarides AA, Sligar SG. Directed self-assembly of monodisperse phospholipid bilayer Nanodiscs with controlled size. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:3477–3487. - PubMed
    1. Bompiani KM, Monroe DM, Church FC, Sullenger BA. A high affinity, antidote-controllable prothrombin and thrombin-binding RNA aptamer inhibits thrombin generation and thrombin activity. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:870–880. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shenoy SK, et al. beta-arrestin-dependent, G protein-independent ERK1/2 activation by the beta2 adrenergic receptor. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281:1261–1273. - PubMed
    1. Williams RJ, Kelly E. Measurement of adenylyl cyclase activity in cell membranes. Methods Mol Biol. 1995;41:63–77. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms