Laboratory Performance of Universal Adhesive Systems for Luting CAD/CAM Restorative Materials

J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):331-40. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a36519.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of several universal adhesive systems applied on five different indirect restorative materials.

Materials and methods: Five CAD/CAM materials were selected: 1) indirect resin composite (LAV); 2) feldspathic glass ceramic (VTR); 3) leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic (EMP); 4) lithium disilicate ceramic (EMX); 5) yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide (CZI). For each material, 15 blocks were cut into 4 rectangular sections (6 × 6 × 6 mm) (n = 60 per group), and processed as recommended by the respective manufacturer. For each indirect material, the following adhesive systems were applied according to the respective manufacturer's instructions: 1) AdheSE Universal [ADU]; 2) All-Bond Universal (ABU); 3) Ambar Universal (AMB); 4) Clearfil Universal (CFU); 5) Futurabond U (FBU); 6) One Coat 7 Universal (OCU); 7) Peak Universal Bond (PUB); 8) Prime&Bond Elect (PBE); 9) Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SBU); 10) Xeno Select (XEN, negative control). After the application of the adhesive system, cylinder-shaped transparent matrices were filled with a dual-curing resin cement (NX3) and light cured. Specimens were stored in water (37°C for 24 h) and tested in shear mode at 1.0 mm/min (mSBS). The failure pattern and μSBS were statistically evaluated (a = 0.05).

Results: LAV, VTR, and EMP showed a greater number of cohesive fractures than EMX and CZI (p < 0.0001). PUB was the only adhesive for which the mean μSBS reached the highest ranking of statistical significance for all five substrates. When each adhesive was compared across the five substrates, 8 out of 10 (ADU, ABU, AMB, CFU, OCU, PUB, PBE, and SBU) reached the statistically highest mean μSBS when applied on CZI.

Conclusion: The specific chemical composition of universal adhesives was not the decisive factor in the bond strength values measured for different CAD/CAM indirect materials. There was a wide variability in mean μSBS when different universal adhesives were applied to the several CAD/CAM indirect materials. Most universal adhesives bonded well to air-abraded zirconia.

MeSH terms

  • Acrylic Resins / chemistry
  • Aluminum Silicates / chemistry
  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate / chemistry
  • Ceramics / chemistry
  • Composite Resins / chemistry
  • Computer-Aided Design*
  • Dental Bonding*
  • Dental Materials / chemistry*
  • Dental Porcelain / chemistry
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing
  • Methacrylates / chemistry
  • Polymethacrylic Acids / chemistry
  • Potassium Compounds / chemistry
  • Resin Cements / chemistry*
  • Shear Strength
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Temperature
  • Time Factors
  • Water / chemistry
  • Yttrium / chemistry
  • Zirconium / chemistry

Substances

  • Acrylic Resins
  • AdheSE cement
  • All-Bond system
  • Aluminum Silicates
  • Ambar
  • Clearfil Bonding Agent
  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Materials
  • Methacrylates
  • One Coat Bond
  • Polymethacrylic Acids
  • Potassium Compounds
  • Prime & Bond
  • Resin Cements
  • futurabond NR
  • lithia disilicate
  • yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia
  • Water
  • Dental Porcelain
  • feldspar
  • leucite
  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
  • Yttrium
  • Glass ceramics
  • Scotchbond
  • Zirconium