Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep;233(18):3353-60.
doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4378-7. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

Effect of Combined Oral Doses of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiolic Acid (CBDA) on Acute and Anticipatory Nausea in Rat Models


Effect of Combined Oral Doses of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiolic Acid (CBDA) on Acute and Anticipatory Nausea in Rat Models

Erin M Rock et al. Psychopharmacology (Berl). .


Rationale: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of oral combined cannabis constituents to reduce nausea.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of combining subthreshold oral doses of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) on acute and anticipatory nausea in rat models of conditioned gaping.

Material and methods: The potential of intragastric (i.g.) administration of THC, CBDA, or combined doses, to interfere with acute nausea-induced conditioned gaping (acute nausea) or the expression of contextually elicited conditioned gaping (anticipatory nausea), was evaluated.

Results: For acute nausea, i.g. administration of subthreshold doses of THC (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) or CBDA (0.5 and 1 μg/kg) significantly suppressed acute nausea-induced gaping, whereas higher individual doses of both THC and CBDA were maximally effective. Combined i.g. administration of higher doses of THC and CBDA (2.5 mg/kg THC-2.5 μg/kg CBDA; 10 mg/kg THC-10 μg/kg CBDA; 20 mg/kg THC-20 μg/kg CBDA) also enhanced positive hedonic reactions elicited by saccharin solution during conditioning. For anticipatory nausea, combined subthreshold i.g. doses of THC (0.1 mg/kg) and CBDA (0.1 μg/kg) suppressed contextually elicited conditioned gaping. When administered i.g., THC was effective on its own at doses ranging from 1 to 10 mg/kg, but CBDA was only effective at 10 μg/kg. THC alone was equally effective by intraperitoneal (i.p.) and i.g. administration, whereas CBDA alone was more effective by i.p. administration (Rock et al. in Psychopharmacol (Berl) 232:4445-4454, 2015) than by i.g. administration.

Conclusions: Oral administration of subthreshold doses of THC and CBDA may be an effective new treatment for acute nausea and anticipatory nausea and appetite enhancement in chemotherapy patients.

Keywords: Acute nausea; Anticipatory nausea; CBDA; Conditioned gaping; Hedonic reactions; Locomotor activity; Oral administration; THC.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 4 articles


    1. Br J Pharmacol. 2012 Apr;165(8):2620-34 - PubMed
    1. Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Oct;170(3):641-8 - PubMed
    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Dec;232(24):4445-54 - PubMed
    1. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(3):199-210 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Jul;11(7):1384-90 - PubMed

Grant support

LinkOut - more resources