Objective: We identify complexities encountered, including unanticipated crossover between trial arms and inadequate 'standard of care' violence services, during a cluster randomized trial (CRT) of a community-level intimate partner violence (IPV) and HIV prevention intervention in Uganda.
Methods: Concepts in public health ethics - beneficence, social value of research, fairness, standard of care, and researcher responsibilities for post-trial benefits - are used to critically reflect on lessons learned and guide discussion on practical and ethical challenges of violence intervention CRTs.
Results: Existing ethical guidelines provide incomplete guidance for responding to unexpected crossover in CRTs providing IPV services. We struggled to balance duty of care with upholding trial integrity, and identifying and providing appropriate standard of care. While we ultimately offered short-term IPV services to controls, we faced additional challenges related to sustaining services beyond the 'short-term' and post-trial.
Conclusion: Studies evaluating community-level violence interventions, including those combined with HIV reduction strategies, are limited yet critical for developing evidence-based approaches for effectively preventing IPV. Although CRTs are a promising design, further guidance is needed to implement trials that avoid introducing tensions between validity of findings, researchers' responsibilities to protect participants, and equitable distribution of CRT benefits.
Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort.Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jan;3(1):e23-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70344-4. Epub 2014 Nov 28. Lancet Glob Health. 2015. PMID: 25539966 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Researchers' perceptions of ethical challenges in cluster randomized trials: a qualitative analysis.Trials. 2013 Jan 3;14:1. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-1. Trials. 2013. PMID: 23286245 Free PMC article.
A public health approach to intimate partner violence prevention in Uganda: the SHARE Project.Violence Against Women. 2012 Dec;18(12):1390-412. doi: 10.1177/1077801212474874. Violence Against Women. 2012. PMID: 23419276
When intimate partner violence against women and HIV collide: challenges for healthcare assessment and intervention.J Forensic Nurs. 2010 Summer;6(2):66-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2010.01071.x. J Forensic Nurs. 2010. PMID: 20507419 Review.
Health sector responses to intimate partner violence: a literature review.Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014 Nov 21;6(1):E1-8. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.712. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014. PMID: 26245388 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by 1 article
Screening, management, and treatment of intimate partner violence among women in low-resource settings.Womens Health (Lond). 2018 Jan-Dec;14:1745506518766709. doi: 10.1177/1745506518766709. Womens Health (Lond). 2018. PMID: 29623772 Free PMC article. Review.