Screening for Skin Cancer in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 27458949
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.5415
Screening for Skin Cancer in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
Importance: Skin cancer, primarily melanoma, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States.
Objective: To provide an updated systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force regarding clinical skin cancer screening among adults.
Data sources: MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies published from January 1, 1995, through June 1, 2015, with surveillance through February 16, 2016.
Study selection: English-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations 15 years and older at general risk for skin cancer.
Data extraction and synthesis: Relevant data were abstracted, and study quality was rated.
Main outcomes and measures: Melanoma incidence and mortality, harms from cancer screening, diagnostic accuracy, and stage distribution.
Results: No randomized clinical trials were identified. There was limited evidence on the association between skin cancer screening and mortality. A German ecologic study (n = 360,288) found a decrease of 0.8 per 100,000 melanoma deaths in a region with population-based skin cancer screening compared with no change or slight increases in comparison regions. The number of excisions needed to detect 1 skin cancer from clinical visual skin examinations varied by age and sex; for example, 22 for women 65 years or older compared with 41 for women aged 20 to 34 years. In 2 studies of performing visual skin examination, sensitivity to detect melanoma was 40.2% and specificity was 86.1% when conducted by primary care physicians (n = 16,383). Sensitivity was 49.0% and specificity was 97.6% when skin examinations were performed by dermatologists (n = 7436). In a case-control study of melanoma (n = 7586), cases diagnosed with thicker lesions (>0.75 mm) had an odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75-0.98) for receipt of a physician skin examination in the prior 3 years compared with controls. Eight cohort studies (n = 236,485) demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between the degree of disease involvement at diagnosis and melanoma mortality, regardless of the characterization of the stage or lesion thickness. Tumor thickness greater than 4.0 mm was associated with increased melanoma mortality compared with thinner lesions, and late stage at diagnosis was associated with increased all-cause mortality.
Conclusions and relevance: Only limited evidence was identified for skin cancer screening, particularly regarding potential benefit of skin cancer screening on melanoma mortality. Future research on skin cancer screening should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of targeted screening in those considered to be at higher risk for skin cancer.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Skin Cancer in Adults: An Updated Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jul. Report No.: 14-05210-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jul. Report No.: 14-05210-EF-1. PMID: 27583318 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2016 Jul 26;316(4):429-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8465. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27458948
-
Screening for Skin Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2023 Apr. Report No.: 22-05297-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2023 Apr. Report No.: 22-05297-EF-1. PMID: 37184188 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Skin Cancer Screening: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1296-1307. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.3262. JAMA. 2023. PMID: 37071090
-
Screening for skin cancer.Am J Prev Med. 2001 Apr;20(3 Suppl):47-58. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00258-6. Am J Prev Med. 2001. PMID: 11306232 Review.
Cited by
-
Predicting skin cancer risk from facial images with an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) based approach: a proof-of-concept study.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 19;71:102550. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102550. eCollection 2024 May. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38545426 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of large language models in management advice for melanoma: Google's AI BARD, BingAI and ChatGPT.Skin Health Dis. 2023 Nov 28;4(1):e313. doi: 10.1002/ski2.313. eCollection 2024 Feb. Skin Health Dis. 2023. PMID: 38312244 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability and appropriateness of a risk-tailored organised melanoma screening program: Qualitative interviews with key informants.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 13;18(12):e0287591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287591. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38091281 Free PMC article.
-
The Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines Focused on the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Cross-Sectional Analysis.JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Dec 7;6:e43821. doi: 10.2196/43821. JMIR Dermatol. 2023. PMID: 38060306 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' Characteristics and Environmental Factors Affecting Skin Cancer Detection: A Multicentre Prospective Study.Acta Derm Venereol. 2023 Aug 22;103:adv11933. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v103.11933. Acta Derm Venereol. 2023. PMID: 37605894 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
