Conservation priorities for the different lines of Dutch Red and White Friesian cattle change when relationships with other breeds are taken into account
- PMID: 27461414
- DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12233
Conservation priorities for the different lines of Dutch Red and White Friesian cattle change when relationships with other breeds are taken into account
Abstract
From a genetic point of view, the selection of breeds and animals within breeds for conservation in a national gene pool can be based on a maximum diversity strategy. This implies that priority is given to conservation of breeds and animals that diverge most and overlap of conserved diversity is minimized. This study investigated the genetic diversity in the Dutch Red and White Friesian (DFR) cattle breed and its contribution to the total genetic diversity in the pool of the Dutch dairy breeds. All Dutch cattle breeds are clearly distinct, except for Dutch Friesian breed (DF) and DFR and have their own specific genetic identity. DFR has a small but unique contribution to the total genetic diversity of Dutch cattle breeds and is closely related to the Dutch Friesian breed. Seven different lines are distinguished within the DFR breed and all contribute to the diversity of the DFR breed. Two lines show the largest contributions to the genetic diversity in DFR. One of these lines comprises unique diversity both within the breed and across all cattle breeds. The other line comprises unique diversity for the DFR but overlaps with the Holstein Friesian breed. There seems to be no necessity to conserve the other five lines separately, because their level of differentiation is very low. This study illustrates that, when taking conservation decisions for a breed, it is worthwhile to take into account the population structure of the breed itself and the relationships with other breeds.
Keywords: Conservation; genetic diversity; population structure; relationships with other breeds.
© 2016 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
Similar articles
-
Assessing priorities for conservation in Tuscan cattle breeds using microsatellites.Animal. 2012 Feb;6(2):203-11. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001443. Animal. 2012. PMID: 22436177
-
Investigations on merging breeds in genetic conservation schemes.J Dairy Sci. 2008 Jun;91(6):2512-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0924. J Dairy Sci. 2008. PMID: 18487675
-
Genetic characterization of the Burlina cattle breed using microsatellites markers.J Anim Breed Genet. 2008 Apr;125(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00707.x. J Anim Breed Genet. 2008. PMID: 18363979
-
Conservation genetics of cattle, sheep, and goats.C R Biol. 2011 Mar;334(3):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Feb 1. C R Biol. 2011. PMID: 21377620 Review.
-
Current Status and Conservation Management of Farm Animal Genetic Resources in Bhutan.Vet Sci. 2023 Apr 6;10(4):281. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10040281. Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 37104436 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Opportunities of Genomics for the Use of Semen Cryo-Conserved in Gene Banks.Front Genet. 2022 Jul 14;13:907411. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.907411. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2022. PMID: 35938018 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selection and Drift: A Comparison between Historic and Recent Dutch Friesian Cattle and Recent Holstein Friesian Using WGS Data.Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;12(3):329. doi: 10.3390/ani12030329. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35158654 Free PMC article.
-
Genomics of a revived breed: Case study of the Belgian campine cattle.PLoS One. 2017 Apr 20;12(4):e0175916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175916. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28426822 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
