Validation of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines/recommendations in white European men presenting for couple's infertility

Fertil Steril. 2016 Oct;106(5):1076-1082.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.044. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively validate the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines/recommendations concerning endocrine evaluation in a cohort of white European men presenting for couple's infertility.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Academic reproductive medicine outpatient clinic.

Patient(s): Cohort of 1,056 consecutive infertile men (noninterracial infertile couples).

Intervention(s): Testicular volume was assessed with a Prader orchidometer. Serum hormones were measured (8-10 a.m.) in all cases. Hypogonadism was defined as total T < 3 ng/mL, according to the Endocrine Society definition. Semen analysis values were assessed based on the 2010 World Health Organisation reference criteria.

Main outcome measure(s): ASRM indications for endocrine assessment in infertile men (sperm concentration <10 million/mL, impaired sexual function, and other clinical findings suggesting a specific endocrinopathy) were used to predict hypogonadism in our cohort. Moreover, a clinically user-friendly three-item nomogram was developed to predict hypogonadism and was compared to the ASRM guidelines assessment.

Result(s): Biochemical hypogonadism was diagnosed in 156 (14.8%) men. Overall, 669 (63.4%) patients would have necessitated total T assessment according to the ASRM criteria; of these, only 119 (17.8%) were actually hypogonadal according to the Endocrine Society classification criteria. Conversely, 37 (23.7%) out of 156 patients with biochemical hypogonadism would have been overlooked. The overall predictive accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ASRM guidelines was 58%, 76%, and 39%, respectively. Our nomogram was not reliable enough to predict hypogonadism, despite demonstrating a significantly higher predictive accuracy (68%) than the ASRM guidelines.

Conclusion(s): The current findings show that the ASRM guidelines/recommendations for male infertility workup may not be suitable for application in white European infertile men.

Keywords: Male infertility; guidelines; hormones; semen parameters; testosterone.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine / standards*
  • Fertility*
  • Guideline Adherence / standards
  • Humans
  • Hypogonadism / blood
  • Hypogonadism / diagnosis*
  • Hypogonadism / ethnology
  • Hypogonadism / physiopathology
  • Infertility, Male / blood
  • Infertility, Male / diagnosis*
  • Infertility, Male / ethnology
  • Infertility, Male / physiopathology
  • Italy / epidemiology
  • Male
  • Nomograms*
  • Organ Size
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic / standards*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sperm Count
  • Testis / pathology
  • Testosterone / blood
  • White People*

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • Testosterone