Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;52(1):35-41.
doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agw058. Epub 2016 Aug 13.

Time Delays in Transdermal Alcohol Concentrations Relative to Breath Alcohol Concentrations

Affiliations

Time Delays in Transdermal Alcohol Concentrations Relative to Breath Alcohol Concentrations

Tara E Karns-Wright et al. Alcohol Alcohol. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: Monitors of transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) provide an objective measurement of alcohol consumption that is less invasive than measurements in blood, breath or urine; however, there is a substantial time delay in the onset of TAC compared to blood or breath alcohol concentrations (BrACs). The current study examined the characteristics of the delay between peak TAC and peak BrAC.

Methods: Data was aggregated from three experimental laboratory studies (N = 61; 32 men, 29 women) in which participants wore a TAC monitor and BrAC was monitored while drinking one, two, three, four and five beers in the laboratory. Analyses examined the sex- and dose-related differences in peak BrAC and TAC, the time-to-peak BrAC and TAC, and time lag between the peak BrAC and TAC values.

Results: The times-to-peak were an increasing function of the number of beers consumed. At each level of beer consumption the peak TAC averaged lower than peak BrAC and times-to-peak TAC were longer than for BrAC. The time-to-peak BrAC and TAC was longer for women than men. The congruence between peak TAC and BrAC increased as a function of the beers consumed. No sex difference in the time lag between peak BrAC and TAC was detected.

Conclusions: The congruence between TAC and BrAC and time lags between TAC and BrAC are related to the number of beers consumed. Peak values of TAC and BrAC became more congruent with higher doses but the time lag increased as a function of the amount of alcohol consumed.

Short summary: The time delay (or lag) and congruence between transdermal vs. BrACs increases as the number of beers increases. Though sex differences are evident in peak transdermal and BrACs, no sex differences were evident in the time lag and the congruence between transdermal and breath alcohol concentrations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Time course of TAC and BrAC for men and women. The curve-fitted TAC and BrAC time-course functions for men and women consuming one to five beers. Generalized additive models (GAM) were used to produce overall smoothed curves of TAC or BrAC as curve-fitted functions of time.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Time-to-peak BrAC and time-to-peak TAC as a function of the number of beers consumed. The average time in minutes to (A) peak BrAC and (B) peak TAC for women and men consuming one to five beers. A total of 24 TAC observations from the one beer condition and three from the two beer condition were removed prior to analyses due to having peak TAC = 0. All participants had a measureable BrAC; and no other observations were removed
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The time lag between TAC and BrAC as a function of the number of beers consumed. A scatterplot of the association between the number of beers consumed and time lag (i.e. time-to-peak TAC minus time-to-peak BrAC). Data are all values collected from all participants across all drinking days
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Peak TAC-to-peak BrAC ratios of men and women as a function of the number of beers consumed. The average peak TAC-to-BrAC ratio of women and men as a function of the number of beers consumed. All observations are present including n = 27 participants who had peak TAC = 0 after drinking one or two beers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson JC, Hlastala MP (2006) The kinetics of transdermal ethanol exchange. J Appl Physiol 100:649–55. - PubMed
    1. Baraona E, Abittan CS, Dohmen K, et al. (2001) Gender differences in pharmacokinetics of alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 25:502–7. - PubMed
    1. Barnett NP, Tidey J, Murphy JG, et al. (2011) Contingency management for alcohol use reduction: a pilot study using a transdermal alcohol sensor. Drug Alcohol Depend 118:391–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dougherty DM, Charles NE, Acheson A, et al. (2012) Comparing the detection of transdermal and breath alcohol concentrations during periods of alcohol consumption ranging from moderate drinking to binge drinking. Exp Clin Psychopharm 20:373–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dougherty DM, Hill-Kapturczak N, Liang Y, et al. (2015. b) The potential clinical utility of transdermal alcohol monitoring data to estimate the number of alcohol drinks consumed. Addict Disord Their Treat 14:124–30. - PMC - PubMed