Evaluation of Malaria Diagnoses Using a Handheld Light Microscope in a Community-Based Setting in Rural Côte d'Ivoire

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Oct 5;95(4):831-834. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0328. Epub 2016 Aug 15.

Abstract

Portable microscopy may facilitate quality diagnostic care in resource-constrained settings. We compared a handheld light microscope (Newton Nm1) with a mobile phone attachment to conventional light microscopy for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum in a cross-sectional study in rural Côte d'Ivoire. Single Giemsa-stained thick blood film from 223 individuals were prepared and read by local laboratory technicians on both microscopes under 1,000× magnification with oil. Of the 223 samples, 162 (72.6%) were P. falciparum positive, and the overall mean parasite count was 1,392/μL of blood. Sensitivity and specificity of the handheld microscope was 80.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.1-85.9%) and 100.0% (95% CI: 92.6-100.0%), respectively, with a positive and negative predictive value of 100.0% (95% CI: 96.4-100.0%) and 65.6% (95% CI: 54.9-74.9%), respectively. If sensitivity can be improved, handheld light microscopy may become a valuable public health tool for P. falciparum diagnosis.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cell Phone
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cote d'Ivoire / epidemiology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Malaria, Falciparum / diagnosis*
  • Malaria, Falciparum / epidemiology
  • Malaria, Falciparum / parasitology
  • Male
  • Microscopy / instrumentation
  • Microscopy / methods*
  • Parasitemia
  • Plasmodium falciparum / isolation & purification*
  • Rural Population
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Young Adult