Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure
- PMID: 27531371
- DOI: 10.1038/jes.2016.42
Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure
Abstract
Inexpensive cloth masks are widely used in developing countries to protect from particulate pollution albeit limited data on their efficacy exists. This study examined the efficiency of four types of masks (three types of cloth masks and one type of surgical mask) commonly worn in the developing world. Five monodispersed aerosol sphere size (30, 100, and 500 nm, and 1 and 2.5 μm) and diluted whole diesel exhaust was used to assess facemask performance. Among the three cloth mask types, a cloth mask with an exhaust valve performed best with filtration efficiency of 80-90% for the measured polystyrene latex (PSL) particle sizes. Two styles of commercially available fabric masks were the least effective with a filtration efficiency of 39-65% for PSL particles, and they performed better as the particle size increased. When the cloth masks were tested against lab-generated whole diesel particles, the filtration efficiency for three particle sizes (30, 100, and 500 nm) ranged from 15% to 57%. Standard N95 mask performance was used as a control to compare the results with cloth masks, and our results suggest that cloth masks are only marginally beneficial in protecting individuals from particles<2.5 μm. Compared with cloth masks, disposable surgical masks are more effective in reducing particulate exposure.
Similar articles
-
Simple respiratory protection--evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles.Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Oct;54(7):789-98. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meq044. Epub 2010 Jun 28. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010. PMID: 20584862 Free PMC article.
-
Penetration of diesel exhaust particles through commercially available dust half masks.Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Apr;57(3):360-73. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes074. Epub 2012 Oct 26. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013. PMID: 23104683
-
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks.ACS Nano. 2020 May 26;14(5):6339-6347. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c03252. Epub 2020 Apr 24. ACS Nano. 2020. PMID: 32329337
-
Effectiveness of face masks for the population.Ann Ig. 2021 Jul-Aug;33(4):347-359. doi: 10.7416/ai.2020.2390. Epub 2020 Dec 3. Ann Ig. 2021. PMID: 33258868 Review.
-
Efficacy and Use of Cloth Masks: A Scoping Review.Cureus. 2020 Sep 13;12(9):e10423. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10423. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 33062538 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A pilot study to evaluate the changes in venous blood gas parameters and hypoxia biomarkers in health care workers using different kinds of masks.Lung India. 2023 Mar-Apr;40(2):134-142. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_343_22. Lung India. 2023. PMID: 37006097 Free PMC article.
-
The COVID-19-wildfire smoke paradox: Reduced risk of all-cause mortality due to wildfire smoke in Colorado during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.Environ Res. 2023 May 15;225:115591. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115591. Epub 2023 Mar 5. Environ Res. 2023. PMID: 36878268 Free PMC article.
-
A Review of Filtration Performance of Protective Masks.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032346. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36767714 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of Inexpensive Cloth Facemasks and Their Amendments to Reduce Ambient Particulate Exposures: A Case of Kathmandu, Nepal.J Environ Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;2023:5144345. doi: 10.1155/2023/5144345. eCollection 2023. J Environ Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36761240 Free PMC article.
-
Responses to Wildfire and Prescribed Fire Smoke: A Survey of a Medically Vulnerable Adult Population in the Wildland-Urban Interface, Mariposa County, California.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1210. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021210. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36673971 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
