Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;27(3):329-341.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9661-2.

Development of the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES) and Validation With Workers Suffering From a Common Mental Disorder or Musculoskeletal Disorder

Affiliations

Development of the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES) and Validation With Workers Suffering From a Common Mental Disorder or Musculoskeletal Disorder

Marc Corbière et al. J Occup Rehabil. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Introduction Common mental disorders (CMDs) and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) lead the list of causes for work absence in several countries. Current research is starting to look at workers on sick leave as a single population, regardless of the nature of the disease or accident. The purpose of this study is to report the validation of the Return to Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES) for people with MSDs and CMDs, based on the disability paradigm. Methods From a prospective design, the ROSES' reliability and validity were investigated in a Canadian sample of workers on sick leave due to MSDs (n = 206) and CMDs (n = 157). Results Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that 46 items spread out on 10 conceptual dimensions (e.g., Fears of a relapse, Job demands, Difficult relation with the immediate supervisor), with satisfactory alpha coefficients and test-retest reliability for all subscales. Finally, several dimensions of ROSES also predict the participant's RTW within 6 months for MSDs (e.g., job demands), and CMDs (e.g., difficult relation with the immediate supervisor), even when adjusted by several variables (e.g., age, severity of symptoms). Apart from the job demands dimension, when the ROSES dimension is more external to the individual, only the perception of obstacles remains significant to predict RTW whereas it is the opposite result when the dimension is more internal (e.g., fears of a relapse). Conclusion The ROSES demonstrated satisfactory results regarding its validity and reliability with people having MSDs or CMDs, at the time of the return-to-work process.

Keywords: Barriers; Common mental disorder; Musculoskeletal disorder; Return-to-work; Self-efficacy.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 6 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215 - PubMed
    1. J Occup Rehabil. 2008 Mar;18(1):27-34 - PubMed
    1. J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Jun;24(2):199-212 - PubMed
    1. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:596572 - PubMed
    1. J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Apr;47(4):428-33 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback