Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
- PMID: 27571284
- DOI: 10.7326/M16-0057
Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Abstract
Background: Sacubitril-valsartan therapy reduces cardiovascular mortality compared with enalapril therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic heart failure.
Design: Markov decision model.
Data sources: Clinical trials, observational analyses, reimbursement data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, drug pricing databases, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention life tables.
Target population: Patients at an average age of 64 years, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV heart failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or less.
Time horizon: Lifetime.
Perspective: Societal.
Intervention: Treatment with sacubitril-valsartan or lisinopril.
Outcome measures: Life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, heart failure hospitalizations, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.
Results of base-case analysis: The sacubitril-valsartan group experienced 0.08 fewer heart failure hospitalization, 0.69 additional life-year, 0.62 additional QALY, and $29 203 in incremental costs, equating to a cost per QALY gained of $47 053. The cost per QALY gained was $44 531 in patients with NYHA class II heart failure and $58 194 in those with class III or IV heart failure.
Results of sensitivity analysis: Sacubitril-valsartan treatment was most sensitive to the duration of improved outcomes, with a cost per QALY gained of $120 623 if the duration was limited to the length of the trial (median, 27 months). No variations in other parameters caused the cost to exceed $100 000 per QALY gained.
Limitation: The benefit of sacubitril-valsartan is based on a single clinical trial.
Conclusion: Treatment with sacubitril-valsartan provides reasonable value in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with NYHA class II to IV heart failure.
Primary funding source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Institute for Clinical and Economic Review.
Comment in
-
Sacubitril-Valsartan in Heart Failure: Why Are More Physicians Not Prescribing It?Ann Intern Med. 2016 Nov 15;165(10):735-736. doi: 10.7326/M16-1932. Epub 2016 Aug 30. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27571568 No abstract available.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Patients Who Have Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 18;166(8):607-608. doi: 10.7326/L17-0044. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28418550 No abstract available.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Patients Who Have Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 18;166(8):606-607. doi: 10.7326/L17-0045. Ann Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28418551 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;1(6):666-72. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1747. JAMA Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27438344
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan Combination Therapy Compared With Enalapril for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.JACC Heart Fail. 2016 May;4(5):392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 30. JACC Heart Fail. 2016. PMID: 27039128
-
Cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.J Med Econ. 2018 Feb;21(2):174-181. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1387119. Epub 2017 Oct 10. J Med Econ. 2018. PMID: 28959905
-
Sacubitril/Valsartan: The Newest Addition to the Toolbox for Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy of Heart Failure.Am J Med. 2017 Jun;130(6):635-639. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 9. Am J Med. 2017. PMID: 28285069 Review.
-
Combined Angiotensin Receptor Antagonism and Neprilysin Inhibition.Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1115-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018622. Circulation. 2016. PMID: 26976916 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The economics of heart failure care.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Jan-Feb;82:90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.010. Epub 2024 Jan 18. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2024. PMID: 38244828 Review.
-
Clinical and Socioeconomic Determinants of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Prescription at Hospital Discharge in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Circ Heart Fail. 2022 Nov;15(11):e009395. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.009395. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Circ Heart Fail. 2022. PMID: 36378759 Free PMC article.
-
Cost effectiveness analyses of pharmacological treatments in heart failure.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 5;13:919974. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.919974. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36133814 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the Consequences of External Reference Pricing for Global Access to Medicines and Innovation: Economic Analysis and Policy Implications.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 6;13:815029. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.815029. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35462921 Free PMC article.
-
Economic Issues in Heart Failure in the United States.J Card Fail. 2022 Mar;28(3):453-466. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.12.017. Epub 2022 Jan 24. J Card Fail. 2022. PMID: 35085762 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials